Research Article |
Corresponding author: Frans Cupedo ( frans@cupedo.eu ) Academic editor: Thomas Schmitt
© 2014 Frans Cupedo.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cupedo F (2014) Reproductive isolation and intraspecific structure in Alpine populations of Erebia euryale (Esper, 1805) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Nota Lepidopterologica 37(1): 19-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.37.7960
|
The subspecies of Erebia euryale (Esper, 1805) have been split into three groups based on morphology, differing in male genital characters. Two of them, the euryale group and the adyte group, are known to be strongly, but not completely, reproductively isolated. There is genetic evidence that their separation preceded the differentiation of subspecies within the euryale group. No such data exist on the third group, the recently recognized kunzi group. In this study, the degree of reproductive isolation between the kunzi group and the other two groups is assessed. In three secondary contact zones, a series of E. euryale populations were sampled in a transect perpendicular to the dividing line. Morphological characteristics showed a clinal gradient along each transect. The steepest gradient was found between the euryale and kunzi groups. Morphologically detectable introgression did not exceed two kilometres. This is comparable to the situation described earlier in contact zones of the euryale and adyte groups. In the contact area of the kunzi and adyte groups, the character gradient slope is more gradual and the morphologically detectable introgression zone is at least five times wider. In contrast to this, contact between subspecies belonging to the same group leads to virtually unrestricted morphological intermingling. It is concluded that the euryale group is reproductively more strongly isolated from the other two groups than the kunzi group is from the adyte group, and that subspecies belonging to the same group are interfertile to a high degree. It is argued that loss of genetic compatibility by long term separation is the main cause of the reproductive isolation between groups, and that, consequently, the actual intraspecific structure of E. euryale results from at least two, probably three, temporally separated differentiation events.
Erebia euryale (Esper, 1805) is a butterfly species with a highly disjunctive distribution and considerable geographic variation. Both its genetic diversity and its distribution pattern have been mainly shaped by climatic fluctuations during the Pleistocene (
Altogether, genetics, morphology, as well as the degree of reproductive isolation, support the hypothesis of a two-level nested structure of E. euryale, at least as far as the euryale and adyte groups are concerned. Little is known, though, on the kunzi group. Morphologically, it has to be ranked in the first level of hierarchical differentiation because it differs considerably from both the euryale and adyte groups in male genital anatomy. At present, genetic data are lacking, and little is known about contact sites with the other two morphological groups (
The aim of the present study is to assess the degree of reproductive isolation between the kunzi group and the other two groups, and to determine whether this is concordant with the morphological traits. For this purpose, three known contact zones, one with the adyte group and two with the euryale group, were intensively sampled. For each of these contact zones, three questions were addressed: (i) Are hybrid populations present in the contact zone? If so, (ii) what is their composition, and (iii) does their composition show a clinal character gradient across the contact zones? If the latter is found to be the case, the steepness of the cline will provide information regarding the strength of reproductive barriers between the groups. Finally, all available data on reproductive isolation in E. euryale are combined in order to establish whether or not they support the hypothesis that two intraspecific differentiation levels exist.
The kunzi group occupies a restricted but well-defined part of the Italian Alps (
The Alps, with geographic boundaries of the taxa of E. euryale discussed in this paper. Light grey: mountain areas above 1000 m, dark grey: lakes. Solid lines: group boundaries. Dotted lines: subspecies boundaries. Circle – the adyte group, with ssp. adyte (1); squares – the euryale group with ssp. isarica (2) and ssp. ocellaris (3); diamonds – the kunzi group, with ssp. pseudoadyte (4) and ssp. kunzi (5). T = Trafoi test region, R = Passo Rolle test region, F = Falcade test region. The intergradation zone isarica / ocellaris is included in the ocellaris area.
Secondary contact with populations of other groups requires natural interruptions in this chain of barriers. Four such “exchange windows” exist, three of which were investigated in this study. These are (i) the Falcade region and (ii) the Passo Rolle region, where the kunzi group (ssp. kunzi) is in contact with the euryale group (represented by ssp. ocellaris), and (iii) the Trafoi valley and the Sulden valley upstream of their confluence near Gomagoi, where the kunzi group (represented by ssp. pseudoadyte) meets the adyte group. The fourth exchange window, the upper Valtellina (Adda valley), was not sampled.
E. euryale has a two year life cycle. In the contact regions, samples were collected in 2009, 2011 and 2013, so the cohorts on the wing were the same in each collecting season. Samples in the Falcade region are labelled F1–F6 (
Topography of the test regions. 2. Falcade test region, 3. Passo Rolle test region and 4. Trafoi test region. Dotted: locations of test populations. Solid line in Figure 3: mountain chain. PR = Passo Rolle; PC = Passo Colbricon. Note the different scale in Figure 4. Reproduced from Tobacco maps 022 (Figures 2 and 3) and 08 (Figure 4).
Samples from the contact regions (called “test samples”) were compared to samples from populations outside the contact region (“reference samples”). Each reference sample consists of 150 individuals of one subspecies. These originate from five localities, scattered in the territory, but at a distance of at least 40 km from the exchange regions. In the adyte territory, no samples were taken west of Lago Maggiore, since ssp. adyte might not be genetically homogeneous in its entire distribution area (
Sampling locations, sample codes and sample sizes of the sampled E. euryale populations. Code = sample code used in this paper; N = sample size.
Sample location | Code | N | Sample location | Code | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ssp. adyte | ad | 150 | Test region Falcade | ||
Eggen am Simplon (CH) | 30 | Falcade-1 | F1 | 60 | |
Pontresina (CH) | 26 | Falcade-2 | F2 | 35 | |
Monte Tamaro (CH) | 26 | Falcade-3 | F3 | 60 | |
Langtauferertal (I) | 30 | Falcade-4 | F4 | 48 | |
Fusio (CH) | 38 | Valle di Gares | F5 | 14 | |
ssp. pseudoadyte | ps | 150 | Valle di Gares | F5 | 14 |
Val Malga, Adamello (I) | 33 | Passo San Pellegrino | F6 | 15 | |
Monte Baldo (I) | 30 | Test region Passo Rolle | |||
Monte Tremalzo (I) | 30 | Paneveggio | R1 | 22 | |
Monte Legnone (I) | 27 | Passo Rolle road, west | R2 | 29 | |
Pradalago, Presanella (I) | 30 | Sentiero laghi di Colbricon | R3 | 44 | |
ssp. kunzi | ku | 150 | Path Rolle - Colbricon | R3 | 50 |
Monte Cavallo (I) | 47 | Passo Rolle road, east | R4 | 30 | |
Vette Feltrine (I) | 30 | San Martino di Castrozza | R5 | 30 | |
Cimonega (I) | 30 | Passo Colbricon (north) | C1 | 37 | |
Col Visentin (I) | 30 | Passo Colbricon | C2 | 25 | |
Monte Grappa (I) | 13 | Passo Colbricon (south) | C3 | 50 | |
ssp. ocellaris | oc | 150 | Test region Trafoi | ||
Geissler Gruppe (I) | 30 | Trafoi, Madatsch | T1 | 60 | |
Sesto (I) | 30 | Trafoi, left bank | T2 | 60 | |
Plöckenpass (I) | 30 | Trafoi, south of camping | T3 | 39 | |
Passo Fedaia (I) | 30 | Sulden, south of Karnerbrücke | T4 | 60 | |
Lienzer Dolomites (A) | 30 | Martelltal, Lify alm | T5 | 60 |
Female genitalia of different groups are indistinguishable. Female wing pattern enables a certain separation of the ssp. kunzi and ocellaris, but not of the ssp. adyte and pseudoadyte. Therefore this study is entirely based on male characters.
Male abdominal tips were macerated for 10 min in a 10%
Individual males were characterised on the basis of four variables. Three of these are characteristics of the valve and one is derived from the wing pattern. Valve characteristics were measured on the right valve, as described and figured in
Specificity (sp) and positive predictive value (ppv) of characters discriminating between the subspecies ocellaris and kunzi of E. euryale. * – Data underlying Table 4 in
ssp | character | value | # true* | # false* | sp ppv | 95% confidence interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ocellaris | HwUnOc | with brown ring | pos | 314 | 7 | 0.9857 | 0.9708-0.9940 |
neg | 54 | 484 | 0.9782 | 0.9556-0.9911 | |||
kunzi | FwUpOc | with white pupil | pos | 183 | 3 | 0.9918 | 0.9763-0.9982 |
neg | 308 | 365 | 0.9839 | 0.9535-0.9965 | |||
kunzi | FwUpOc | absent | pos | 78 | 7 | 0.9810 | 0.9612-0.9923 |
neg | 413 | 361 | 0.9176 | 0.8376-0.9661 | |||
kunzi | HwUpOc | absent | pos | 323 | 30 | 0.9158 | 0.8857-0.9443 |
neg | 167 | 338 | 0.9150 | 0.8809-0.9419 | |||
kunzi | FwUpB | absent | pos | 157 | 4 | 0.9891 | 0.9724-0.9970 |
neg | 334 | 364 | 0.9752 | 0.9375-0.9930 | |||
kunzi | FwUnB | absent | pos | 115 | 0 | 1.0000 | 0.9899-1.0000 |
neg | 376 | 368 | 1.0000 | 0.9681-1.0000 |
Measurements for shoulder index and first tooth were made using a Mitutoyo 176-902 measuring microscope (magnification 30-fold). Tooth length was measured from calibrated microphotographs on a monitor (final magnification 1000-fold). Variable 4 was assessed with +2 dioptre glasses.
Characterizing individuals and samples. A scoring system was developed by which each individual and each sample could be characterised. For each variable, the values of all individuals in both reference groups (e.g. adyte and pseudoadyte) were combined. The hereby obtained numerical range was split into seven categories, labelled -3 to +3. The centre of the zero category of the scale coincides with the intersection of the frequency distributions of the two reference groups. For each male, the value of each variable was converted into a score, equal to the category it falls into, thus ranging from -3 to +3. Each individual male was characterised by the sum of its scores for the three variables, potentially ranging from -9 (the most adyte-like individuals) to +9 (the most pseudoadyte-like ones). The scoring procedure was essentially the same in the analysis of the kunzi and ocellaris samples, except for the fact that variable 3 was replaced by variable 4, which has only three categories: -3 (ocellaris), +3 (kunzi) or zero (no discriminating wing character present). Each sample was characterised by the frequency distribution of its individual scores.
Identifying transitional samples. The frequency distributions of the scores in test samples were compared with those in the reference samples, using the Mann-Whitney U test. A test sample was considered transitional if it differed significantly (p < 0.05, two-sided) from both reference samples.
Test for hybridization. The question whether a transitional sample contains hybrids requires recognition of hybridization, not necessarily of hybrid individuals. Testing for hybridization was based on the assumption that hybrid butterflies are hardly ever equal to one of their parents: they exhibit either a combination of parental characters, or they have intermediate characters (
Illustration of the procedure for detection of hybrids. A: frequency distributions of scores in reference samples; B: frequency distribution of scores in the combined reference samples, and in a test sample; C: as B, X-axis categories are made absolute. D: as C, cumulative. X-axis: score (A and B) or absolute score (C and D); Y-axis: proportion of the sample.
Test for clinal variation. In each test sample, the proportions of individuals with a negative score and with a positive score were calculated. This provides a good approximation of the proportions of parental characters in the population, without the need of individual identification, and regardless of the hybridization rate in the population. These proportions were used to detect geographic clines in the contact zones. Because of the small overlap of the distributions of scores in the adyte and pseudoadyte reference samples, 3.3% of the positive scores are incorrectly classified as pseudoadyte, and 5.3% of the negative scores are incorrectly classified as adyte. The more one of both types is predominant, the more this will affect the adyte / pseudoadyte ratio. As a result, any clinal character gradient in the adyte / pseudoadyte contact zone will be slightly underestimated.
Statistical tests were performed with the SPSS 12.0 package. Specificity and positive predictive value of discriminating characters were calculated with MedCalc online statistical calculators for Windows, version 12.7.8.
Samples and genital preparations are deposited in the collection of the author.
The distributions of individual scores per sample are shown in
Mann-Whitney’s significance levels for pair wise comparison of the frequency distributions of the scores of all samples. A: Falcade test region; B: Trafoi test region; C: Passo Rolle test region; D: Passo Colbricon. For sample codes see
Distributions of individual scores per sample, in reference samples and test samples of E. euryale.
-9 | -8 | -7 | -6 | -5 | -4 | -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | N | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | ad | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 36 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 150 | ||||||||
samples | ps | 3 | 5 | 11 | 31 | 33 | 27 | 24 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 150 | |||||||||
oc | 7 | 15 | 46 | 41 | 25 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 150 | ||||||||||||
ku | 4 | 1 | 12 | 23 | 33 | 47 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 150 | |||||||||||
Falcade | F1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 60 | |||||||||
F2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 35 | |||||
F3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 60 | ||||||||
F4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 48 | ||||
F5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | |||||||||||||
F6 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Passo | R1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 22 | |||||||||||||
Rolle | R2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 29 | ||||||||||
R3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 50 | ||||||
R4 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 30 | |||||||||||||
R5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
C1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 37 | |||||
C2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 25 | ||||||||
C3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 16 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 50 | |||||||||||||
Trafoi | T1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 60 | ||||||||||
T2 | 6 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 60 | |||||||||||
T3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 39 | ||||||||||||
T4 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 60 | |||||||||||
T5 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 60 |
In
The score distributions of the transitional samples in the hybrid zones kunzi / ocellaris are different from those in the hybrid zone adyte / pseudoadyte (
The fractions of negative and positive scores (
Proportions of individuals with a negative and with a positive score, in each of the E. euryale samples.
Reference samples | Passo Rolle | ||||||||||||
Scores | ad | ps | oc | ku | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | C1 | C2 | C3 | |
< 0 | 0.93 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.00 | |
> 0 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.64 | 1.00 | |
Falcade | Trafoi | ||||||||||||
Scores | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||
< 0 | 0.97 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 0.07 | ||
> 0 | 0.02 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.62 | 0.80 |
Transitional samples were present in each of the three contact zones, and in each of them hybridization took place, so the contact zones discussed in this paper explicitly are hybrid zones. There is, however, a noticeable variation in the score distributions of the test samples, both among and within contact areas. Field observations yield enough additional information to explain these differences.
1. The Falcade test region. In the Falcade contact zone, the northern slopes of the Valle di Vales are inhabited by ssp. ocellaris, whereas ssp. kunzi occupies the southern slopes. Samples F1 and F3 were taken from high-density populations, living in clearings in a mixed fir-larix forest, with F1 at the upper tree limit on the northern slope (1870 m), and F3 in the lower part of the opposite slope (1670 m). In between, individuals of E. euryale were scarce, flying along roadsides and on hay meadows. A local concentration was only found at location F2. The contact zone, which was sampled in 2009, was revisited in 2013. The situation at F1 and F3 was unaltered. In between, though, more individuals were present than in 2009, but no concentration was observed at site F2. This gives the impression of two stable, permanent populations (F1 and F3), from where individuals swarm out, annually, into the less suitable zone in between. This would explain the temporary character of F2, as well as its bimodal distribution. The score distribution of F1 does not differ significantly from the ocellaris reference sample, and F3 shows a kunzi-like distribution, which tails out on the left side, evidencing hybridization with ocellaris. Apparently, down slope roaming (F1 → F3) exceeds uphill movement in this locality.
One kilometre downstream, the valley floor (at 1250 m) was inhabited by the hybrid population F4. Due to the inaccessibility of the slopes here, no migration was actually observed, but the composition of the population strongly supports a regular influx from both sides. Given the high population density in a favourable habitat, this population has to be considered a permanent and breeding population. This might explain why the hybrid ratio is the highest among the analysed hybrid populations.
2. The Passo Rolle test region. In the Passo Rolle region, it is the Latemar chain and its continuation, the Focobon chain, that separate kunzi from ocellaris. Two depressions in this chain, the Passo Rolle and the Passo Colbricon, are potential exchange windows. The largest one, Passo Rolle, is an ecologically devastated area, which offers no suitable habitat to E. euryale. A single specimen was observed. Exchange of individuals takes place over the much narrower Passo Colbricon, 2.5 km southwest of Passo Rolle. Here, E. euryale was present in relatively high density, on the pass and on both sides. In this continuous population, connecting the ocellaris area with the kunzi area, an extra set of three samples was taken from nearby sites. C2 was collected on the pass (within 20 metres around the pass mark,
3. The Trafoi test region. In the Trafoi contact zone, adyte is widespread west of the Trafoi valley, and pseudoadyte occurs east of the Sulden valley. The Tabaretta chain of the Ortler Massif is inserted in between (
In each of the contact zones, a clinal gradient of characters is obvious (
The kunzi group and the euryale group. In the Falcade contact area, the fraction of ocellaris characters drops from 0.97 to 0.08 between F1 and F3, and the fraction of kunzi characters from 0.88 to 0.02 in the opposite direction (
The kunzi group and the adyte group. In the Trafoi region, the mean decline is 42% over at least 4.5 km, more probably 8 km. Due to the different spacing of sampling, these data cannot directly be compared to those from the kunzi / ocellaris contact regions. Nonetheless, if either in the Falcade or in the Passo Rolle region two populations had been analysed 4.5 km apart, hardly any morphological evidence of introgression was to be expected. In the Trafoi region, though, the decline over this distance is only 42%. This at least justifies the conclusion that introgression between the kunzi group and the adyte group is less inhibited by reproductive barriers than between the kunzi group and the euryale group.
The euryale group and the adyte group.
Subspecies within groups. Hybrid zones of two subspecies of E. euryale belonging to the same group are rare, since most of them have allopatric distributions. It is only in the Pyrenees and in the Alps that two subspecies of the same group (the euryale group) are in secondary contact. In both cases, one of the two subspecies is strongly melanistic, which enables easy identification of hybrid individuals by wing pattern. The hybrid zone in the Pyrenees is insufficiently documented, but it covers a considerable part of the Pyrenees (pers. obs.). The hybrid zone in the Alps (ssp. isarica and ssp. ocellaris) has been mapped (
More or less stable transition zones between genetically distinct populations have been described in a great variety of organisms (
Considering the width of the introgression zone, we should keep in mind that morphological markers are far less sensitive than genetic ones.
This study of hybrid zones reveals that strong reproductive barriers exist between the euryale group and both the adyte group and the kunzi group. Our results suggest a less strong reproductive isolation of the adyte group and the kunzi group, but the different spacing of the test samples and the different characters used to discriminate between the groups impede an unambiguous numeric comparison of the results. Reproductive barriers between the subspecies isarica and ocellaris, both belonging to the euryale group, are so weak that they suggest random mating and a high hybrid viability. Consequently, at least two, maybe three, hierarchical levels of reproductive isolation exist between E. euryale populations. Since the degree of reproductive isolation is positively correlated with genetic distance, i.e. the duration of the interruption of gene flow (
I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan E.R. Frijters, who developed the scoring system and the hybridization test, to Dr. Tamara van Mölken for her critical remarks on the initial version of manuscript, to Prof. Dr. Thomas Schmitt for acting as the editor, and to Mr. Hub L.E. Peters who corrected the English text.