Research article
Print
Research article
Choreutidae of Madeira: review of the known species and description of the male of Anthophila threnodes (Walsingham, 1910) (Lepidoptera)
expand article infoJadranka Rota, Antonio Aguiar, Ole Karsholt§
† University of Turku, Turku, Finland
‡ Laboratório de Qualidade Agrícola, Santa Cruz, Portugal
§ The Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Open Access

Abstract

We review and illustrate the four species of Choreutidae recorded from Madeira – Anthophila threnodes (Walsingham), A. fabriciana (Linnaeus), Choreutis nemorana (Hübner), and Tebenna micalis (Mann) – and describe and illustrate for the first time the male of A. threnodes, as well as the biology of this Madeiran endemic. We provide brief notes on each of the species and give short diagnoses for correctly identifying them. Finally, we discuss previous misidentifications of Madeiran choreutids and the occurrence of choreutids on other oceanic islands.

Introduction

The Lepidoptera fauna of the Madeira Islands consists of only 331 species (Aguiar and Karsholt 2008). This is mainly due to the isolated position of these islands in the Atlantic Ocean, and only to a lesser extent to insufficient collecting efforts. The Macrolepidoptera fauna, and especially the butterflies (Papilionoidea), are considered to be well known, with only a few and mostly invasive species being added in recent years. Among the Microlepidoptera, new discoveries still occur regularly, and a number of taxonomic problems still await resolution.

Madeiran lepidopterology began with Thomas Vernon Wollaston who, for health reasons, stayed in Madeira for long periods between 1847 and 1855 and also made later visits to the island. His results, including descriptions of many new species, were published by himself (Wollaston 1858) and Stainton (1859). Subsequent important contributions to the Lepidoptera fauna of the Madeira Islands were made by Walsingham (1894) and Rebel (1917, 1940). Easier access to the islands by airplane and the use of modern equipment (e.g., mercury vapour lamps) during the second half of the 20th century resulted in an increasing number of specimens available for study. Results of these efforts were summarized in the recent catalogue by Aguiar and Karsholt (2006), and data from that work were used for the checklists by Aguiar and Karsholt (2008) and Karsholt and Nieukerken (2011). A brief introduction to lepidopterology in Madeira was published by Karsholt (2000).

Below we treat the small family Choreutidae. Currently, 413 species of choreutids are described, and most of them are found in the tropics (Rota unpublished database). They are usually diurnal and often brightly coloured. So far four species have been found in Madeira. We describe and illustrate the unknown male and the biology of the endemic Anthophila threnodes (Walsingham), and provide images and brief notes on the other three species: Anthophila fabriciana (Linnaeus), Choreutis nemorana (Hübner), and Tebenna micalis (Mann). At the end we discuss earlier misidentifications of Madeiran choreutids.

Methods

Genitalia dissections and terminology follow Rota (2008a). Plant names are from the Plant List website (2010). Photographs of adults were taken using Leica Application Suit MZ 16A and Zerene Helicon Stacker program for stacking subsequent images at ZMUC. Photographs of genitalia slides were taken using an Olympus SZX16 microscope with motorized focus drive attached to an Olympus E520 digital camera and they were then combined by using the programs Deep Focus 3.1 and Quick Photo Camera 2.3 at the Zoological Museum of the University of Turku. All images were improved in Adobe Photoshop CS3.

We conducted standard DNA extraction from abdomens of two specimens of Anthophila threnodes (voucher codes noted below) and attempted standard PCR amplification of the DNA barcode (cytochrome oxidase subunit I) using primers LCO and HCO (Folmer et al. 1994). When this failed, we used a primer internal to the DNA barcode (K699; Mitchell et al. 2005) in combination with LCO and successfully amplified 326 base pairs from one of the specimens (DNA voucher An_th2; see details under material examined). As this fragment was very short, we attempted to obtain more sequence data and after some trials with the commonly amplified nuclear genes in Lepidoptera (Wahlberg and Wheat 2008), we were finally successful in obtaining two fragments of the nuclear gene GAPDH using newly designed primers by Niklas Wahlberg (GAP1F/GAP2R and GAP3F/GAP4R; primer sequences in Table 1), resulting in a total of 580 base pairs of GAPDH. We carried out a phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated sequences from A. threnodes together with the sequences of four other species of Anthophila, and another choreutid, Prochoreutis inflatella, as an outgroup (Appendix), using MrBayes v.3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) running on the CIPRES server (Miller et al. 2010). The data were analysed unpartitioned, with two concurrent runs each with one cold and three heated chains for one million generations, and 25% of trees were discarded as burnin. Convergence was assessed by ensuring that standard deviation of split frequencies was well below 0.05 (it was 0.001 at the end of the analysis), that PSRF values were all very close to 1.000 (they ranged 1.000–1.005), and by visual inspection of plots of log likelihood and all parameters in Tracer v1.5 (Rambaut and Drummond 2007). Sequence length and GenBank accession number for each species are listed in the Appendix.

Primers used for PCR amplification of the nuclear gene GAPDH.

Primer pairs and sequence
GAP1F (AARGCTGGRGCTGAATATGT) / GAP2R (TAACTTTGCCRACAGCYTT)
GAP3F (GTGCCCARCARAACATCAT) / GAP4R (CGGCTGGAGTARCCATAYTC)

Data from the type material are cited literally whereas data from the other material are given in a standardized format.

Abbreviations

AMFA – Collection of Antonio M. F. Aguiar, Funchal, Madeira

BMNH – The Natural History Museum, London, U.K.

ICLAM – Insect Collection Laboratório de Qualidade Agrícola, Madeira, Portugal

SIP – Collection of Leo Sippola, Pirkkala, Finland

ZMUC – Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Anthophila threnodes (Walsingham, 1910)

Figs 1, 2, 918

Hemerophila threnodes Walsingham, 1910: 257.

Material examined

Holotype. 1♀, ‘B.M. Genitalia Slide 20115 A. Diak’ | ‘Type’ ’Madeira, V. 1886, Leech, 62296’ | ‘Walsingham Collection 1910-427’ | ‘Hemerophila threnodes Wals., ♀, Ent. Monthly Mag. 46, p. 257 (1910). Type ♀ (1/1) descr. 62296’ (BMNH). 1♂, 1♀, ‘Madeira: 1858. Wollaston. BM 1858-21.’ | ‘Simaethis fabriciana L. teste Stn. Ann-Mag. N. H. (3. s) III. 210, no 4 (1859), Topotype Madeira.’ | ‘V’ [May] (BMNH); 1♂, Funchal, 20–31.iii.1995, leg. L. Sippola, genitalia slide Rota JR2013-05, DNA voucher for extraction An_th2 (ZMUC); 1♂, Cabo Girão, Cruz da Caldeira, 8.vii.1999, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar, genitalia slide Rota JR2013-04, DNA voucher for exraction An_th1 (AMFA); 1♀, Vereda da Entrosa, Arco de São Jorge, 225 m, 12.ii.2000, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar (AMFA); 3♂, 2♀, same data but la. 14.ii.2001, Urtica sp., leg. A. M. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (AMFA, ICLAM); 2♂, 3♀, same data but 200 m, la. 29.xi.2001, Urtica sp., leg. A. M. F. Aguiar & O. Karsholt, genitalia slides Hendriksen 5240, Karsholt 5236 (AMFA, ZMUC); 2♀, same data but, 15.v.2003, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (AMFA); 1♀, AM 5089, Levada Grande, Boaventura, 285m, 4.iii.2000, larva on Urtica membranacea, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar (AMFA); 1♀, Monte, 20.iii.2002, leg. L. Sippola (SIP).

Remarks

Hemerophila threnodes was originally described from one female collected in Madeira by J. H. Leech in May 1886. No exact locality was stated. Based on the material collected more recently, we provide a description of the male. We also illustrate female genitalia.

Description

A. threnodes is characterized by its dark, almost black wings and a scattering of light bluish scales on the thoracic dorsum and forewing upperside (Figs 1, 2). The forewings have a cream-white spot at two-thirds of costa and another such spot at four-fifths of the dorsum; fringes are black and cream-white beyond black fringe-line. Hindwings are uniform dark brown.

Figures 1–4.

Adults in dorsal and lateral view. 1–2. Anthophila threnodes; 3–4. Anthophila fabriciana (scale bar = 2 mm).

Figures 5–8.

Adults in dorsal and lateral view. 5–6. Choreutis nemorana; 7–8. Tebenna micalis (scale bar = 2 mm).

Male genitalia (Fig. 9). Tegumen triangular with small uncus extending from its apex. Papillae anales present as elongate, somewhat elliptical patches with long hairs. Gnathos well developed as a long, somewhat curved, pointed hook. Vinculum ventrally rounded with a small, triangular saccus (obscured in Fig. 9a, but visible in slide JR2013-04, which is not illustrated). Valva broad, somewhat oval, with a pointed costal process and an unsclerotized triangular, rounded extension distally; distally and ventrally covered with hairs. Juxta as a hood-like plate (in Fig. 9b attached to phallus). Phallus shorter than valva, slightly sigmoidal, with a sharp spine at one-third from apex (Fig. 9c).

Figures 9–10.

Anthophila threnodes: male genitalia (9a), phallus (9b, c) (9a and 9b from slide Karsholt 5236, ZMUC; 9c from slide JR2013-04, ZMUC), female genitalia (10a), inset showing magnified corpus bursae (10b) (scale bar = 0.2 mm).

Female genitalia (Fig. 10). Apophysis posterioris slender, slightly broader at base; ca. 1.5 times as long as anterioris and much less thick. Apophysis anterioris greatly enlarged in the middle, tapering basally and even more so distally. Ostium on segment 7. Ductus bursae very gradually widening into corpus, with a slight twist of about one to two revolutions. Corpus bursae oval, small, with a signum as small patch of dentations (Fig. 10b).

Host plant

Urtica membranacea Poir. ex Savigny and probably other Urtica spp. (Urticaceae).

Remarks

Larvae have been found in March, May, and November, and adults have been collected in February, March, May, and July, indicating at least two broods. The adult flies during the day. It occurs in open landscapes at low altitudes.

Immature stages and biology

(Figs 1118). Larva is off-white with dark brown spots (Figs 14, 15) and it spins a thin web on or around the young leaves on which it feeds (Figs 12, 13). The pupa is reddish brown (Fig. 16), and in addition to the single rows of dorsal spines on abdominal segments A2–7 (Figs 17, 18) it also has dorsal lacunae – small round holes in a row immediately posterior to the spines.

Figures 11–16.

Anthophila threnodes: 11. Adult on its host plant; 12–13. Larval webbing tying young leaves; 14–15. Larva; 16. Pupa and an empty pupal shell in the inset.

Figures 17–18.

Anthophila threnodes pupa (17) with the close-up of dorsal spines and lacunae (18).

Diagnosis

A. threnodes is characterized by its blackish wings, and should be relatively easy to differentiate from the other Lepidoptera in Madeira. It resembles A. fabriciana but the wings of that species are much lighter greyish brown. Male genitalia are very similar to those of A. fabriciana, but they differ in having a much shorter spine on the phallus. Female genitalia are similar to those of other species of Anthophila, but they differ in only having a hint of spiralization in the basal third of the ductus bursae, unlike those of e.g. A. fabriciana (L.), A. abhasica Danilevsky, and A. armata Danilevsky, where the spiralization is apparent. We cannot find differences between the larvae of A. threnodes and A. fabriciana in their general appearance (the differentiation between the two would likely be possible based on the ultrastructure as seen with the scanning electron microscope, but this has not been done).

Anthophila fabriciana (Linnaeus, 1767)

Figs 3, 4

Phalaena (Tortrix) fabriciana Linnaeus, 1767: 880.

Material examined

1♀, Vereda da Entrosa, Arco de São Jorge, 225 m, 14.ii.2001, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar (ICLAM).

Host plant

Urtica sp. (Urticaceae).

Remarks

This is a new record for Madeira. The single specimen was collected at the same place as several A. threnodes. We examined photographs of this specimen deposited in the BMNH and are of the opinion that it is correctly identified.

Diagnosis

A. fabriciana resembles A. threnodes, but differs by its greyish brown wings. It has the cream-white spots apically at costa and dorsum connected by a light zigzag-line, and has a white streak near the margin in the hindwings (Figs 3, 4).

Choreutis nemorana (Hübner, 1899)

Figs 5, 6, 19, 20

Tortrix nemorana Hübner [1799]: pl. 1, fig. 3.

Material examined

Serra d’Água, Pousada dos Vinhaticos, 660 m, 10♂, 13♀, 12–13.ix.1975, leg. O. Lomholdt & N. L. Wolff; São Vicente, sea level, 1♀, 16.vi.1993; 5♂, 3♀, same data, but larva on Ficus carica, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); São Vicente, Ribeira do Inferno, 79m, 3♂, 12.ix.1996, leg. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (AMFA, ICLAM); Ponta do Pargo, Porto do Pesqueiro, 311 m, 1♂, 1♀, 23.iv.1994, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar (AMFA); Fajã da Nogueira, 600–1000 m, 1♀, 8.x.1994, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); Curral das Freiras, 850 m, 1♂, 20.ix.1997, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); same data, but 597 m, 3♂, 2♀, la. 16.iv.1998, Ficus carica, leg. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus; 3♂, 1♀, same data, but 7.v.1998 (ICLAM); Estreito de Câmara de Lobos, Levada do Norte, Garachico, 1♂, 1♀, 538 m, 26.vii.2001, J. Jesus (AMFA, ICLAM).

Host plant

Ficus carica L. (Moraceae).

Remarks

This species is common wherever there are Ficus carica trees. Larvae, hiding under a thin web, skeletonise mainly young leaves (Figs 19, 20). They have been found in June, and adults have been collected in April–July and September–November, at altitudes from sea level to 1000 m. C. nemorana is only a minor pest on figs in Madeira. The adult flies during day. Male and female genitalia were illustrated by Diakonoff (1986): pl. 66, fig. 81 (male), and pl. 142, fig. 81 (female).

Figures 19–20.

Choreutis nemorana: larva under its webbing on the host plant Ficus carica (19) and larva exiting its web-shelter after being disturbed (20).

Diagnosis

The almost square, brown forewings, and the black and yellow hindwings make C. nemorana unmistakeable among Madeiran Lepidoptera (Figs 5, 6).

Tebenna micalis (Mann, 1857)

Figs 7, 8

Choreutis micalis Mann, 1857: 181.

Material examined

Funchal, Lido, 1♂, 20.viii.1974, leg. E. Traugott-Olsen, genitalia slide Wolff 4298; same locality, but 50 m, 1♀, 18.x.1997, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); Fajã da Nogueira, 1000 m, 4♂, 2♀, 23.viii.1974, leg. E. Traugott-Olsen, genitalia slide Wolff 4294, Rasmussen 4849; same locality, but 600–1000 m, 2♂, 8.x.1994, leg. O. Karsholt, genitalia slide Hendriksen 5765; same locality, but 700 m, 3♂, 2♀, 18.ix.1997, leg. O. Karsholt; same locality, but 1♀, 500 m, 25.xi.2001, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); same locality, but 1♀, 864 m, la. 14.vii.1998, Helichrysum foetidum, leg. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (ICLAM); Caniço, 2♂, 12–18.ix.1977, leg. O. Lomholdt & N. L. Wolff (ZMUC); Ponta de São Lourenço, sea level, 9♂, 4♀, 24–27.vi.1993, 1♀, 11.vii.1993, 1♂, 17.ix.1997, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); Machico, sea level, 1♂, 27.vi.1993, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); Achadas da Cruz, 725 m, 3♂, 2♀, 8.vii.1993, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); Porto Moniz, sea level, 1♀, 9.x.1994, leg. O. Karsholt (ZMUC); Santo da Serra, 700 m, 8♂, 2♀, 26.x.1994, larva on Helichrysum foetidum, leg. O. Karsholt, genitalia slide Hendriksen 5766 (ZMUC); 1♂, Estreito de Câmara de Lobos, Jardim da Serra, 1130 m, 22.x.1998, leg. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (ICLAM); 1♀, Porto da Cruz, Chão das Feiteiras, 1251 m, 12.xi.1998, leg. A. M. F. Aguiar (AMFA); 1♂, 5♀, Santana, Pico, Posto Agrario, 411 m, la. 12.xi.1998, Arctium minus; same data, but 1♀ 1.vi.1999, leg. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (ICLAM); 1♂, Boaventura, Vereda da Entrosa, 130 m, 12.ii.2000; 5♂, 3♀, same data, but 175 m, la. 14.ii.2001, Helichrysum melaleucum, leg. F. Aguiar & J. Jesus (AMFA, ICLAM); 1♂, 1♂, Estreito de Câmara de Lobos, Levada do Norte, Garachico, 538 m, 26.vii.2001 leg. J. Jesus (ICLAM); 1♀, Machico, Funduras, 605 m, 12.vi.2003, leg. J. Jesus (ICLAM); 1♀, Santana, Achada do Gramacho/ Cais de São Jorge, 267 m, 21.vii.2011, leg. J. Jesus (ICLAM); 1♂, Camacha, Levada dos Tornos, direction Camacha – Monte, 788 m, Cirsium vulgare, la. 13.vi.2013, leg. S. Fontinha (ICLAM).

Host plants

Arctium minus (Hill.) Bernh., Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten., Helichrysum foetidum (L.) Cass. and Helichrysum melaleucum Rchb. (Compositae).

Remarks

Larvae have been found in October, November, February, June, and July, and adults have been collected in all months from June to November, at altitudes from sea level to 1250 m. The adult flies during the day and comes to light. This is a widespread species. In addition to being present on Madeira, it occurs on the Canaries, throughout the Mediterranean, from central and eastern Europe throughout southern Asia to China and Japan, as well as possibly on Marianne Islands, Java, and New Zealand (Diakonoff 1986). It is the only choreutid occurring in the Azores Islands, where it inhabits all larger islands (Karsholt and Vieira 2005). Male and female genitalia were illustrated by Diakonoff (1986): pls. 46, 47, figs 54-1 and 54-2 (male), pl. 127, fig. 54 (female).

Diagnosis

With its sub-triangular forewings with black and metallic markings adult T. micalis is unique among Madeiran Lepidoptera (Figs 7, 8). It can be separated from the similar T. bjerkandrella (Thunberg, 1784) by the presence of a subplical black and metallic spot in the forewing in T. micalis; such a spot is missing in T. bjerkandrella (Diakonoff, 1986).

Molecular results

The successfully amplified A. threnodes COI haplotype is unique and it differs from the A. alpinella haplotype in 14 bases, and from the A. fabriciana haplotype in 12 bases. In the resulting phylogenetic tree, Anthophila threnodes and A. fabriciana are sister species, but without statistical support (PP or posterior probability = 0.81). Together, they are strongly supported as being the sister group to the North American species Anthophila alpinella (PP = 1).

Discussion

One of the aims of this paper was to provide the necessary information for correctly identifying Madeiran choreutids because misidentifications have been common in the past. For example, A. threnodes was misidentified as A. fabriciana by Stainton (1859) (as ‘Simaëthis Fabriciana Linnaeus’) and subsequent authors, and it remained as such on the list of Madeiran Lepidoptera until 2006 (Aguiar and Karsholt 2006). The specimen of A. fabriciana listed above is the only specimen of that species known from Madeira, while all the other ones previously identified as A. fabriciana are actually A. threnodes. Although A. fabriciana is a common species in mainland Europe, in addition to being recorded only once from Madeira, it has also been found only once in the Canary Islands, “based on a single specimen (“61978”), taken in April 1884 [in Tenerife], by the late Mr. J. H. Leech” (Walsingham 1908). The Lepidoptera fauna of the Canary Islands (and especially Tenerife) is relatively well studied, and it is surprising that A. fabriciana had not been found again in the islands, suggesting that the species failed to establish itself there, which is in agreement with Rebel’s opinion (1911) that the single specimen might have resulted from an accidental importation.

Figure 21.

Bayesian tree showing the relationships among species of Anthophila. The numbers below branches are posterior probabilities.

Furthermore, Tebenna bjerkandrella (Thunberg), a species similar to T. micalis, has been noted as found in Madeira several times (e.g., by Walsingham 1894, 1908; Rebel 1911). However, all Madeiran specimens examined by us belong to the latter species, and the presence of bjerkandrella in Madeira requires confirmation. It is likely that records of bjerkandrella from other Macaronesian archipelagos also refer to T. micalis (Aguiar and Karsholt 2006).

The biology of the immature stages of A. threnodes is typical for the whole family. Spinning a thin web on or around the young leaves on which the larva feeds is known from a number of other genera (Rota 2005, Rota 2008b). Likewise, the morphology of the pupa is also shared with several other genera. For example, the dorsal lacunae (Figs 17, 18) that are found in the pupa of A. threnodes are also known to occur in the other species of Anthophila (Patočka 1999), as well as in Asterivora Dugdale (Dugdale 1979), Caloreas Heppner (Keifer 1937), Hemerophila Hübner (Rota unpublished), Rhobonda Walker (Rota 2005), Prochoreutis Heppner, and Tebenna Billberg (Patočka 1999). Their function remains unknown.

Finally, we discuss other choreutids that are known to occur on oceanic islands. For example, Brenthia leptocosma Meyrick is currently known only from Mauritius (Williams 1951). Then there is a species of Choreutis that appears to be a pest on Ficus sp. (Moraceae) on the Hawaiian islands (W. Nagamine, pers. comm.), and another species, Niveas kone Rota, is known from the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea (Rota and Miller 2013). All of this suggests that choreutids disperse fairly well, but most likely through passive wind dispersal because they are small moths without strong flight capabilities.

As A. threnodes is endemic to Madeira, it would be interesting to firmly establish its sister species so as to try to ascertain the origin of this species. We attempted to do so using molecular data, but were highly limited by the small amount of sequence that we obtained from our material and therefore our finding that A. fabriciana is the sister species of A. threnodes can only be taken as a preliminary result although this also appears to be supported by the close similarity of the two species in their external appearance, as well as their genitalia. Ideally, molecular work employing phylogeographic methods, conducted on freshly collected material of a large number of specimens of A. alpinella, A. fabriciana, and A. threnodes, as well as other potential close relatives of A. threnodes, would provide an answer with more certainty than we can do at this point.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Kevin Tuck, The Natural History Museum, London, U.K. for access to the collections and for information and photographs of specimens; to Jurate De Prins, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium; and Leo Sippola, Pirkkala, Finland for loan of specimens. We greatly appreciate the input on an earlier version of the manuscript provided by Martin Corley and Marko Mutanen. JR was funded by the Finnish Kone Foundation while doing this research. OK´s work on the Lepidoptera of Madeira project was supported by a grant from the Carlsberg Foundation (Denmark).

References

  • Aguiar AMF, Karsholt O (2006) Lepidoptera. Systematic catalogue of the entomofauna of the Madeira Archipelago and Selvagens Islands 1. Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal, Supplement 9: 5–139.
  • Aguiar AMF, Karsholt O (2008) Ordem Lepidoptera. In: Borges PAV, Abreu C, Aguiar AMF, Carvalho P, Jardim R, Melo I, Oliveira P, Sérgio C, Serrano ARM, Vieira P (Eds) A list of the terrestrial fungi, flora and fauna of Madeira and Selvagens archipelagos. Direcção Regional do Ambiente da Madeira and Universidade dos Açores, Funchal and Angra do Heroísmo, 438 pp.
  • Arita Y (1987) Taxonomic studies of the Glyphipterygidae and Choreutidae (Lepidoptera) of Japan. Transactions of the Shikoku Entomological Society 18: 1–244.
  • Diakonoff A (1986) Glyphipterigidae auctorum sensu lato. In: Amsel HG, Gregor F, Reisser H, Roesler U (Eds) Microlepidoptera Palaearctica 7(1): i–xx, 1–436; 7(2): pls 1–175. Karlsruhe.
  • Dugdale JS (1979) A new generic name for the New Zealand species previously assigned to Simaethis auctorum (Lepidoptera: Choreutidae), with description of a new species. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6: 461–466. doi: 10.1080/03014223.1979.10428386
  • Folmer O, Black MB, Hoch W, Lutz RA, Vrijehock RC (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.
  • Karsholt O (2000) Contributions to the Lepidoptera fauna of the Madeira Islands. 1. Introduction. Beiträge zur Entomologie 50: 397–405.
  • Karsholt O, van Nieukerken EJ (Eds) (2011) Lepidoptera. Fauna Europaea version 2.4. http://www.faunaeur.org [accessed 28 January 2011]
  • Karsholt O, Vieira V (2005) Lepidoptera. In: Borges PAV, Cunha R, Gabriel R, Martins AF, Silva L, Vieira V (Eds) A list of the terrestrial fauna (Mollusca and Arthopoda) and flora (Bryophyta, Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta) from the Azores. DirecçãoRegional do Ambiente und Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroismo and Ponta Delgada, 318 pp.
  • Keifer HH (1937) California Microlepidoptera XII. Bulletin of the Department of Agriculture of California, Sacramento 26: 334–338.
  • von Linnaeus C (1767) Systema naturae, 12th ed, 1(2). Holmiae, Salvius, 533–1327, [1–37].
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA: 1–8.
  • Mitchell A, McClay AS, Pohl GR, Sperling FAH (2005) PCR-based methods for identification of two Eteobalea species (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae) used as biocontrol agents of weedy Linaria species (Scrophulariaceae). Canadian Entomologist 137: 129–137. doi: 10.4039/n03-104
  • Patočka J (1999) Über die Puppen der mittel- und westeuropäischen Choreutidae (Lepidoptera: Choreutoidea). Entomologische Berichten 59: 53–58.
  • Rebel H (1940) Die Arthropodenfauna von Madeira nach den Ergebnissen der Reise von Prof. Dr. O. Lundblad, Juli-August 1935. XXIII. Übersicht der Lepidopterenfauna Madeiras. Arkiv för Zoologi 32A(5): 1–13.
  • Rebel H (1911) Sechster Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Kanaren. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 24: 327–374, pl. 12.
  • Rebel H (1917) Siebenter Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Kanaren. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 31: 1–62.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Rota J (2005) Larval and pupal descriptions of the Neotropical choreutid genera Rhobonda Walker and Zodia Heppner (Lepidoptera: Choreutidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 98: 37–47. doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098[0037:LAPDOT]2.0.CO;2
  • Rota J (2008a) A new genus and new species of metalmark moths (Lepidoptera: Choreutidae) from Costa Rica. Zootaxa 1933: 12–18.
  • Rota J (2008b) Immature stages of metalmark moths from the genus Brenthia Clemens (Lepidoptera: Choreutidae): morphology and life history notes. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 62: 121–129.
  • Rota J, Miller SE (2013) A new genus of metalmark moths (Lepidoptera, Choreutidae) with Afrotropical and Australasian distribution. ZooKeys 355: 29–47. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.355.6158
  • Stainton HT (1859) Notes on Lepidoptera collected in Madeira by T. V. Wollaston, Esq.; with descriptions of some new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Ser. 3) 3: 209–214.
  • Wahlberg N, Wheat CW (2008) Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera. Systematic Biology 57: 231–242. doi: 10.1080/10635150802033006
  • Walsingham T de Grey (1894) Catalogue of the Pterophoridae, Tortricidae and Tineidae of the Madeira Islands, with notes and descriptions of new species. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1894: 535–555.
  • Walsingham T de Grey (1908) Microlepidoptera of Tenerife. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1907: 911–1034, pls 52–53.
  • Walsingham T de Grey (1910) Madeiran Tineidae (Lepidoptera). Entomologist’s monthly Magazine 46: 257–259.
  • Williams JR (1951) The bionomics and morphology of Brenthia leptocosma Meyrick (Lep., Glyphipterygidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 41: 629–635. doi: 10.1017/S0007485300027887
  • Wollaston TV (1858) Brief diagnostic characters of undescribed Madeiran insects. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (3. Ser. ) 1: 113–125.

Appendix

Specimen information, sequence length, and GenBank accession numbers.

Species voucher code museum (ID No.) CAD COI-begin COI-end EF1a-begin EF1a-end GAPDH IDH MDH RpS5 wingless
Prochoreutis inflatella Pr_in_CT_1 - 850 bp 593 bp 756 bp 506 bp 675 bp 691 bp - 321 bp 590 bp 400 bp
JQ958422 KJ844047 HQ533107 HQ541504 HQ541504 JQ958449 - KJ844059 JQ958499 HQ541579
Anthophila threnodes An_th2 ZMUC - 326 bp - - - 580 bp - - - -
- KJ844048 - - - KJ844052 - - - -
Anthophila fabriciana An_f_BE_2 - 412 bp 584 bp 774 bp 517 bp 675 bp 661 bp 402 bp 405 bp 596 bp 365 bp
JQ958399 JQ958507 HQ533054 HQ541451 HQ541451 JQ958431 KJ844055 JQ958543 JQ958477 HQ541532
Anthophila alpinella An_a_CA_2 - 412 bp 588 bp 774 bp 495 bp 645 bp 690 bp 697 bp 406 bp 596 bp 400 bp
JQ958398 KJ844049 HQ533053 HQ541450 HQ541450 JQ958430 JQ958454 JQ958542 JQ958476 HQ541531
Anthophila sp. (Peru) An_sp651 ZMUC - 326 bp - - - 298 bp - - - -
- KJ844050 - - - KJ844053 - - - -
Anthophila sp. (Rwanda) An_JDP1_5570 RNCA (ENT 5570) 414 bp 620 bp 453 bp 177 bp 313 bp 691 bp 315 bp - 550 bp 342 bp
KJ844057 KJ844051 KJ844051 KJ844058 KJ844058 KJ844054 KJ844056 - KJ844060 KJ844061