Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Sara La Cava ( sara.lacava@crea.gov.it ) Academic editor: Théo Léger
© 2025 Sara La Cava, Giada Zucco, Teresa Bonacci, Stefano Scalercio.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
La Cava S, Zucco G, Bonacci T, Scalercio S (2025) DNA barcoding of Tineidae from South Italian forests reveals faunistic novelties and potentially undescribed species (Lepidoptera, Tineoidea). Nota Lepidopterologica 48: 203-214. https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.48.149560
|
Tineidae Latreille, 1810 includes about 119 species in Italy. Despite their economic and ecological importance, this family remains poorly studied in peninsular Italy, primarily due to taxonomic impediment. The aims of this paper were to improve molecular reference libraries to overcome the taxonomic impediment and to increase the knowledge of Tineidae in South Italian forests. The examined material was collected from the southernmost tip of peninsular Italy. A total of 85 specimens were DNA barcoded, recovering 74 sequences and 27 Barcode Index Numbers of which three are new to the Barcode of Life Data system. 66 specimens were assigned to 24 species. 67% of these identified species represent new records for parts of Italy or for the entire country. Notably, Pelecystola fraudulentella (Zeller, 1852) is new for Italy, while Haplotinea insectella (Fabricius, 1794), Reisserita relicinella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1853), Stenoptinea cyaneimarmorella (Millière, 1854), Monopis neglecta Šumpich & Liška, 2011, and Triaxomera fulvimitrella (Sodoffsky, 1830) are new for South Italy. Additionally, 10 species are new for the Calabria region. The most interesting cases concern eight specimens belonging to the genera Nemapogon Schrank, 1802 and Neurothaumasia Le Marchand, 1934. These specimens exhibited genetic distance ranging of 3.74% and 6.73% respectively from their nearest neighbors and morphology of genitalia cannot help to assign them to a known species. Further taxonomic studies are needed to ascertain their taxonomy.
The family Tineidae Latreille, 1810 belongs to the superfamily Tineoidea Latreille, 1810 which includes a variable number of families depending on different systematic assessments (
In recent decades, the study of Tineidae in Italy has been limited, with most records included in comprehensive faunistic studies on Lepidoptera (
The importance of Tineidae, beyond their well-known economic significance, also lies in their high potential as bioindicators of forested habitats (
The aims of this paper were: (1) to improve the basic knowledge of Tineidae in South Italian forests; (2) to highlight cases requiring further taxonomic studies; and (3) to improve molecular reference libraries to overcome the taxonomic impediment associated to Tineidae as bioindicators.
The examined materials were primarily collected in the Calabria region, the southernmost tip of Peninsular Italy, during surveys conducted mainly in well-preserved mountainous forest habitats and highly fragmented plain forests. Specifically, the surveys that included the collection of Tineidae specimens targeted the following habitats (see references for further details): retrodunal areas (
Standardised samplings were conducted using UV LED light traps (
Finally, a cross-check of wing patterns with available iconography (
74 specimens were successfully DNA barcoded, yielding sequences with a length ranging from 648–672 base pairs. These sequences, along with images and collection data, are available in the public dataset DS-TINEITS on BOLD. (https://v4.boldsystems.org/index.php/MAS_Management_DataConsole?codes=DS-TINEITS). Specimens clustered into 27 BINs, corresponding to 24 identified and two unidentified species (Table
Summarised results of DNA barcoding of the analysed sample. BIN: Barcode Index Number; n: number of barcoded specimens in this study; NBIN: number of records available in BOLD for a BIN (27th of December 2024); NNdist: distance from the Nearest Neighbour; New for Italy: NI; New for South Italy: NSI; New for Calabria: NC; NA: not applicable.
| BIN | n | NBIN | Taxon | NNdist (%) | Nearest Neighbour | Faunistic novelty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unidentified taxa | ||||||
| BOLD:ADQ6761 | 3 | 7 | Nemapogon sp. | 3.74 | Nemapogon hungaricus | NA |
| BOLD:AAV6344 | 5 | 1 | Neurothaumasia sp. | 6.73 | Neurothaumasia cretica | NA |
| Identified taxa | ||||||
| BOLD:ACS5343 | 3 | 4 | Morophaga morellus | 6.05 | Morophaga choragella | none |
| BOLD:AAF5407 | 1 | 25 | Morophaga choragella | 6.05 | Morophaga morellus | none |
| BOLD:AAE8582 | 1 | 18 | Triaxomera fulvimitrella | 10.9 | Triaxomera puncticulata | NSI |
| BOLD:AAD9379 | 1 | 20 | Triaxomera parasitella | 3.30 | Triaxomera parasitella | NC |
| BOLD:AAF4848 | 1 | 7 | Triaxomera parasitella | 3.30 | Triaxomera parasitella | NC |
| BOLD:AAX6122 | 4 | 2 | Nemapogon inconditella | 4.01 | Nemapogon reisseri | NC |
| BOLD:ADR8751 | 3 | 17 | Nemapogon signatellus | 3.53 | Nemapogon reisseri | NC |
| BOLD:AAI3059 | 7 | 69 | Nemapogon variatella | 5.57 | Nemapogon granella | none |
| BOLD:AAU3216 | 2 | 8 | Infurcitinea finalis | 3.53 | Infurcitinea finalis | none |
| BOLD:AAF3207 | 5 | 21 | Stenoptinea cyaneimarmorella | 4.36 | Stenoptinea cyaneimarmorella | NSI |
| BOLD:AFT3285 | 1 | 0 | Haplotinea insectella | 3.21 | Haplotinea insectella | NSI |
| BOLD:AFB7048 | 3 | 3 | Crassicornella crassicornella | 8.33 | Crassicornella sp. | none |
| BOLD:AFR9903 | 1 | 0 | Reisserita relicinella | 3.21 | Reisserita relicinella | NSI |
| BOLD:AAJ8384 | 2 | 13 | Trichophaga tapetzella | 9.72 | Trichophaga scandinaviella | NC |
| BOLD:AAE7482 | 1 | 13 | Tinea dubiella | 5.94 | Tinea flavescentella | NC |
| BOLD:AAQ3791 | 2 | 10 | Tinea basifasciella | 4.33 | Tineidae specimen | NC |
| BOLD:AAD5562 | 1 | 38 | Tinea trinotella | 2.86 | Tinea trinotella | NC |
| BOLD:AAF3430 | 2 | 60 | Niditinea fuscella | 6.17 | Niditinea truncicolella | NC |
| BOLD:AAG3680 | 4 | 47 | Niditinea striolella | 6.17 | Tinea sp. | none |
| BOLD:AAB6631 | 9 | 59 | Monopis laevigella | 4.23 | Monopis jussii | none |
| BOLD:ABW5878 | 3 | 15 | Monopis neglecta | 9.27 | Monopis laevigella | NSI |
| BOLD:AFT4096 | 1 | 0 | Monopis obviella | 2.72 | Monopis obviella | NC |
| BOLD:AAC5209 | 1 | 46 | Monopis crocicapitella | 2.69 | Monopis sp. | NC |
| BOLD:AAL3625 | 1 | 1 | Pelecystola fraudulentella | 4.17 | Pelecystola nearctica | NI |
| BOLD:AAH4351 | 6 | 624 | Opogona omoscopa | 8.97 | Opogona sacchari | none |
Male genitalia of species with more than one BIN on BOLD. 2. Triaxomera parasitella, BOLD:AAF4848, slide CREA-0288, Alessandria del Carretto; 3. Infurcitinea finalis, BOLD:AAU3216, slide CREA-0290, Montalto Uffugo; 4. Haplotinea insectella, BOLD:AFT3285, slide CREA-0297, Spezzano della Sila; 5. Reisserita relicinella, BOLD:AFR9903, slide CREA-0296, Marcellinara.
Details of female genitalia belonging with more than one BIN on BOLD. 6. Triaxomera parasitella, BOLD:AAD9379, slide CREA-0289, Pedace; 7, 8. Stenoptinea cyaneimarmorella, BOLD:AAF3207, slide CREA-0292, Acquaformosa; 9. Tinea trinotella, BOLD:AAD5562, slide CREA-0294, Marcellinara; 10. Monopis obviella, BOLD:AFT4096, slide CREA-0295, Spezzano della Sila.
Morphology of genitalia confirmed molecular identifications but were unable to identify two taxa belonging to the genera Nemapogon and Neurothaumasia. Their nearest neighbors showed distances of respectively 3.74 and 6.73% indicating the need of further taxonomic studies, potentially representing undescribed taxa.
All identified species are illustrated in Figs
Habitus of identified species. 11. Morophaga morellus, LEP-SS-04478, Marcellinara; 12. Morophaga choragella, LEP-SS-04474, Longobucco; 13. Triaxomera fulvimitrella, LEP-SS-04557, Taverna; 14. Triaxomera parasitella, LEP-SS-04483, Alessandria del Carretto; 15. Nemapogon inconditella, LEP-SS-04533, Sangineto; 16. Nemapogon signatellus (flipped), LEP-SS-04489, Sellia; 17. Nemapogon variatella, LEP-SS-04500, Spezzano della Sila; 18. Infurcitinea finalis, LEP-SS-05175, Spezzano della Sila; 19. Stenoptinea cyaneimarmorella, LEP-SS-04687, San Giovanni in Fiore; 20. Haplotinea insectella, LEP-SS-04532, Spezzano della Sila; 21. Crassicornella crassicornella, LEP-SS-04502, Marcellinara; 22. Reisserita relicinella, LEP-SS-04496, Marcellinara; 23. Trichophaga tapetzella, LEP-SS-04491, Marcellinara; 24. Tinea dubiella, LEP-SS-04507, Rende; 25. Tinea basifasciella, LEP-SS-04517, Sellia; 26. Tinea trinotella, LEP-SS-04524, Marcellinara; 27. Niditinea fuscella, LEP-SS-04495, Sellia; 28. Niditinea striolella, LEP-SS-04505, Saracena; 29. Monopis laevigella, LEP-SS-04503, Spezzano della Sila; 30. Monopis neglecta, LEP-SS-04545, Longobucco; 31. Monopis obviella (flipped), LEP-SS-04535, Spezzano della Sila; 32. Monopis crocicapitella, LEP-SS-04481, Cosenza; 33. Pelecystola fraudulentella, LEP-SS-04514, Saracena; 34: Opogona omoscopa, LEP-SS-01431, Marcellinara.
This paper represents the largest study ever carried out on South Italian Tineidae, integrating molecular and morphological techniques for their identification. We found 24 species, some of which of high faunistic interest, improving the DNA barcoding library of this family with molecular data gathered from an under-investigated European region.
Available molecular libraries allowed us to identify most of our specimens on a molecular basis. In the meantime, genitalia dissection enabled us to identify specimens for which molecular identification was not possible, as, although the species were already known, both sequence and the BINs were new to BOLD. Compared to other families, Tineidae showed a relatively high number of species having more than one BIN. In this study 30% of Tineidae species have more than one BIN, whilst in the Iberian Peninsula only the 2.5% of Erebidae (
The most interesting cases of our study concern the unidentified specimens belonging to the genera Nemapogon and Neurothaumasia. In the BOLD database, these genera are currently represented by 52 and five species, respectively. For Nemapogon, 39 species are described from Europe (
The implementation of DNA barcoding libraries can also help to identify preimaginal stages (
The investigation of lepidopteran diversity in forest ecosystems allowed us to highlight the rich Tineidae fauna hosted by these habitats, revealing that many discoveries are yet to be made. Most of our specimens were collected from broadleaved forests, likely because they are rich in polypore fungi, one of the preferred larval foods of Tineidae, that grow predominantly in this forest type compared to conifer forests (
This research enabling us to enlarge the regional and national distribution of several species, among which the most interesting is Pelecystola fraudulentella, rarely recorded in Europe. It was first described from Slovenia, and its second record, after about 150 years, was published from Sweden (
Monopis neglecta was recently described from Central European countries with one of the paratypes collected near Lake Como (
Triaxomera fulvimitrella is primarily known from Central and northern Europe, with only a single record from northern Italy (www.boldsystems.org). The specimen we collected in the beech forest of the Sila Mountains represents a very disjunct record marking the southernmost known presence of this species in Europe.
The Tineidae records presented in this paper are by-catches of surveys aimed at describing macromoth communities of forests. As a result, the habitus of some specimens was not always perfectly preserved since most samples were collected using light traps, non-phototactic species were not sampled, and quantitative data are lacking. However, we discovered several faunistic novelties, and DNA barcoding not only facilitated the specimen identification, but also highlighted the presence of taxa that require further taxonomic investigation. The distribution of the sampling sites also shows that large areas of the region remain unsampled and deserve future investigation (Fig.
We thank Carlo di Marco, Silvia Greco, and Marco Infusino for helping us in field activities. We also thank Pollino National Park and Sila National Park for the collecting permissions. This study was supported by the Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica (SEL), which covered the publication fee under its fee waiver program. We sincerely thank the SEL for this support. This work was funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4 - Call for tender No. 3138 of 16 December 2021, rectified by Decree n.3175 of 18 December 2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU; Project code CN_00000033, Concession Decree No. 1034 of 17 June 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP83D21014060006, Project title “National Biodiversity Future Center - NBFC”, and Agritech National Research Center European Union NextGenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR)MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4—D⋅D 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022).