Research Article
Print
Research Article
Two new species of the Dichomeris juniperella (Linnaeus, 1761) complex from the Carpathians and the Alps (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae)
expand article infoZoltán Kovács‡, Peter Huemer§, Peter Buchner|, Sándor Kovács#
‡ Unaffiliated, Miercurea Ciuc, Romania
§ Naturwissenschaft, Sammlungs- und Forschungszentrum, Tiroler Landesmuseen Betriebsges.m.b.H, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| Unaffiliated, Schwarzau am Steinfeld, Austria
¶ Natural History Museum Vienna (NHMV), Vienna, Austria
# Unaffiliated, Sfântu Gheorghe, Romania
Open Access

Abstract.

Dichomeris carpatiella Kovács, Kovács & Buchner, sp. nov. is described from the alpine zone of the Făgăraș, Cibin, Parâng and Retezat Mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania). The new species inhabits south-facing rocky habitats with junipers in the highest regions of the Southern Carpathians. The larva feeds, hibernates and pupates between spun needles of Juniperus communis L., and may be attacked by the parasitoid Pimpla turionellae (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ichneumonidae). It is closely related to D. juniperella (Linnaeus, 1761) and D. marginella (Fabricius, 1781). Another closely related species, D. dolomiella Huemer, sp. nov., discovered in high montane to subalpine dwarf-shrub communities on scree-rich dolomite substrate in the south-eastern Alps (Friuli-Venetia Giulia and South-Tyrol, Italy), belongs to the same species-complex. Adults, male and female genitalia and the habitats of the two new species are described and figured. Molecular data and some details of the biology are given.

Introduction

Dichomeris Hübner, 1818 is the most species-rich genus in the family Gelechiidae, with nearly 600 species distributed almost worldwide (Gregersen and Karsholt 2022). In Europe around 900 named Gelechiidae species are known belonging to 109 genera, among them the genus Dichomeris with 19 species (Huemer and Karsholt 2020; Lepiforum 2026).

In a recent overview of the Romanian Gelechiidae fauna 10 Dichomeris species were listed as occurring, including an unnamed taxon collected in the Southern Carpathians and resembling D. juniperella (Linnaeus, 1761) (Kovács and Kovács 2022). In the last few years the authors have collected additional material and further studied this unnamed species. Differences from D. juniperella in external morphology and the genitalia of both sexes, the different habitat preference, combined with the results of molecular studies, confirmed the suspicion that it was an undescribed species. Also, in the checklist of the European Gelechiidae, Huemer and Karsholt (2020) had already mentioned that D. juniperella splits into two strongly divergent Barcode Index Numbers (BINs), one widespread, the other restricted to the south-eastern Alps, reflecting a possible case of cryptic diversity. The latter genetic cluster, based on material from Friuli-Venetia Giulia and South Tyrol (Italy), is now confirmed as another new species of the complex, supported both by morphology and DNA barcodes. The two new species are compared with the most closely related congeners, D. juniperella and D. marginella (Fabricius, 1781).

Materials and methods

Extensive material of the four species was examined, with the two new species collected in the Romanian Carpathians and the Italian Alps. The examined material was dried, pinned and either traditionally set or spread. The terminology of the wing pattern and the genitalia follows Gregersen and Karsholt (2022).

DNA tissue samples (dried legs) from 15 specimens (Dichomeris juniperella: five specimens, D. marginella: four specimens, D. carpatiella sp. nov.: three specimens, D. dolomiella sp. nov.: three specimens) were prepared for DNA barcoding, a method that usually allows accurate species identification from a 658-base-pair long segment of the COI gene. These samples were successfully processed at the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario (University of Guelph, Canada) to obtain DNA barcodes, using the standard high-throughput protocol described by deWaard et al. (2008). Additionally, 12 public sequences from BOLD (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007; Ratnasingham 2018) were used as reference material for tree construction, with Anasphaltis renigerellus (Zeller, 1839) (Gelechiidae) as an outgroup. Complete voucher data and images of these specimens are available in the public dataset [https://doi.org/10.5883/DS-DICHJUNI] “Barcoding Dichomeris juniperella species group”.

Sequences were assigned to BINs, algorithm-based operational taxonomic units that provide an accurate proxy for species (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013). BINs are automatically calculated for records in BOLD that comply with the DNA Barcode standard. Degrees of intra- and interspecific variation in the DNA barcode fragments were calculated under the Kimura 2-parameter model of nucleotide substitution using the analytical tools of BOLD Systems v. 4.0 (http://www.boldsystems.org). The calculation of intraspecific distance was further normalised using BOLD’s calculation tools to reduce sampling bias at the species level. A neighbor-joining tree of the DNA barcode data from the dataset was constructed using MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021) under the Kimura 2-parameter model for nucleotide substitutions.

Male genitalia preparation, performed by PB, is a variant of the so-called unrolling technique for the preparation of complex genitalia introduced by Pitkin (1986). The difference in the technique consists of the cutting of both membranous connections between the vinculum and the tegumen (instead of the cutting of the right-hand side connection alone) which allows the symmetric setting on the slide of the both resulting parts. Standard unrolled slides were prepared by PH. Male slides were stained with Mercurochrome. Female genitalia preparation follows standard techniques (Robinson 1976) and the genitalia were stained with Chlorazol Black E and with Mercurochrome.

Photographs by PB were taken with a Canon EOD 5D Mark Ⅲ camera, adults with a Canon lens MP-E 65, using ring flash and a magnification of 2:1 and genitalia with a Wild Heerbrugg microscope using a 10× objective and a 2.5× ocular lens. Adult photographs by PH were taken with an Olympus OM-D Mark III camera equipped with a 60-mm macro lens, while genitalia images were obtained using a Zeiss Axiolab 5 microscope connected to an Olympus OM-D Mark III camera. Images were stacked using Helicon Focus 4.80 software and post-processed with Adobe Photoshop software. Photograph of the habitat in Romania was taken using Huawei Nova 5T mobilephone.

Abbreviations used

HNHM Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary;

TLMF Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Taxonomy

Dichomeris carpatiella Z. Kovács, S. Kovács & P. Buchner, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 7, 11, 15, 19–20, 24, 28

Material examined.

Holotype: ROMANIA • ♂; Southern Carpathians, Făgăraș Mountains, Iezerul Caprei; alt. 2100 m; 14 Jul. 2023; ex pupa, pupa 12 Jul. 2023, Juniperus [communis L.]; [DNA sample] TLMF_Lep_38534; genitalia slide Buchner m3915; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. (Miercurea Ciuc).

Figures 1, 2. 

Adults of Dichomeris carpatiella Kovács, Kovács & Buchner, sp. nov.: 1. Male, holotype; 2. Female, paratype, Romania, Făgăraș Mountains; photographs P. Buchner.

Paratypes: ROMANIA • 1 ♂, 5 ♀; Southern Carpathians, Parâng Mountains, Cărbunele; alt. 2100 m; 13 Jul. 2016; genitalia prep. 2466/♂/ Kovács [= genitalia slide Buchner m3910] and 2877/♀/ Kovács [= genitalia slide Buchner w3911]; [DNA sample ♀] TLMF_Lep_38518, [DNA sample ♀] TLMF_Lep_47439; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll., 1 ♀ TLMF. • 1 ♂; Southern Carpathians, Făgăraș Mountains, Iezerul Caprei; alt. 2000 m; 28 Jul. 1994; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. • 2 ♂, 2 ♀; same locality; alt. 2100 m; 3 Jul. 2022; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. • 1 ♂; same locality; alt. 2100 m; 18 Jun. 2024; ex pupa, pupa 12 Jun. 2024, Juniperus [communis L.]; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. • 1 ♂; same locality; alt. 2100 m; 20 Jun. 2024; ex pupa, pupa 12 jun. 2024, Juniperus [communis L.]; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. • 1 ♀; same locality; alt. 2100 m; 22 Jun. 2024; ex pupa, pupa 12 Jun. 2024, Juniperus [communis L.]); genitalia slide Buchner w3914; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. • 1 ♂; same locality; alt. 2100 m; 23 Jun. 2024; ex pupa, pupa 12 Jun. 2024, Juniperus [communis L.]; S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. • 1 ♂; Southern Carpathians, Retezat Mountains; alt. 2300 m; 14 Aug. 1992; L. Rákosy leg.; TLMF. • 1 ♂; same locality; alt. 2000 m; 15 Jul. [1]928; genitalia slide B. Tóth 2454m; [L.] Diószeghy leg.; HNHM. • 2 ♂; [Southern Carpathians,] Berinen [= Cibin Mountains]; 20/7 [= 20 Jul. 1900]; e.l. [= ex larva]; genitalia slide B. Tóth 2455m; [D.] Czekelius leg.; [ex] coll. Uhryk; HNHM.

Description.

Adult, male (Fig. 1). Head: smooth, covered with black scales ventrally and laterally around the eye; frons curved, covered with whitish grey lamellate scales; vertex with tufts of grey, whitish grey tipped scales except lateral sides covered with white long scales; ocellus distinct; compound eye large; antenna ⅔ the length of forewing, with scape and pedicellus grey, but dorsally both black, flagellum ringed grey-black, ciliate; proboscis well developed, brownish grey, scaled; maxillary palp tiny, brownish grey; segment 1 of labial palp short and covered with black scales, segment 2 long with tuft of long scales projecting forwards and upwards, scales grey, whitish grey tipped on ¼ dorsal part of outer surface, dorsal surface and ½ dorsal part of inner surface and black on the rest, segment 3 long, pointing upwards, grey except black on the ventral surface and around apex. Thorax and tegulae covered with long grey, whitish grey tipped scales. Wingspan (measured to the nearest half mm) 16–19 mm, forewing length 7.5–8.5 mm. Forewing sub-triangular, ratio (calculated by the width divided by length) 0.27 to 0.28. Forewing covered with grey scales at the basal and sub-basal areas and with grey scales mixed with numerous and unevenly dispersed grey black tipped scales in the rest of the wing, and mixed with a few whitish grey scales in the post-median and apical areas. Markings black and whitish grey: narrow basal black streak on costa; small, elongate, indistinct whitish grey sub-basal spot below costa; long, indistinct whitish grey post-median costal spot followed by similar, but short sub-apical spot; two black, rounded discal spots at about ⅖ and ⅗ of the wing; distinct whitish grey interstigmatic patch and similar but shorter patch immediately distal of discal 2 spot; plical stigmata elongate, black, 1 indistinct, 2 distinct; row of nine indistinct black dots, three of them on costa from post-median costal spot toward apex and six terminal dots from apex towards tornus. Fringes black around apex, along termen whitish grey with two distinct black terminal lines, plain whitish grey to tornus.

Hindwing broadly trapezoidal, ratio 0.30 to 0.31, apex short and pointed, the termen below the apex sinuate, grey, fringes whitish grey with two indistinct black terminal lines.

Underside brownish grey, fringes similar, but with yellowish base and with two indistinct black dividing lines. Legs brownish grey, dorsally with long yellowish grey scales.

Abdomen grey, dorsally each segment distally edged with a row of yellowish grey scales, last segment greyish yellow.

Variation: the grey black tipped scales may form tiny and indistinct black patches in the apical ⅓ of the forewing; whitish grey post-median and sub-apical spots may vary in size and may be more or less confluent; plical stigma 1 may be absent; some of the costal or terminal small black dots may be absent; all these combined may result in slightly darker or lighter specimens.

Female (Fig. 2). Head with appendages and thorax as in male; flagellum with shorter cilia. Smaller than the male on average, wingspan 15.5–17.5 mm, forewing length 6.5–7.5 mm; forewing narrower (ratio 0.25 to 0.26), but hindwing wider (ratio 0.32); the extent of the mixed grey black tipped and whitish grey scales in the post-median and apical areas almost equal; pattern similar.

Variation: whitish grey post-median costal spot may be larger or may even form a weak post-median fascia; whitish grey interstigmatic patch may be shorter; plical stigmata may be confluent.

Male genitalia (Figs 7, 11, 15, 19–20). Uncus fused with tegumen, of medium length, hood-like and spinose, apex slightly concave. Uncus with pair of tiny pinnacles (socii) laterally, each bearing a strong hair. Gnathos basally with pair of crook-shaped lateral processes, gnathos-hook falcate, slightly angulated. Culcitula heavily spinose. Tegumen short, with flap-like lobes. Parateguminal sclerites a pair of small, dorsally oriented, tapering and setose lobes (but sectioned in the midline and hanging near the parateguminal hair-sack on the slide). Parateguminal hair-sack with coremata (the latter not visible on the slide). Valva long, with longitudinal fold, basal ⅗ narrow and distally widening, then abruptly widening at ⅗, distal ⅖ parallel sided, apically rounded and setose. Sacculus short, wide and sparsely setose, with smooth margins, lateral margin straight, medial margin evenly curved, apex tapering. Vinculum long and narrow, ventrally projecting, with wide folding zone, concave medially. Juxta a pair of long and asymmetric lobes, basally fused with medial vinculum, left process 1.25 times longer than right, both slightly sinuous, distally with tiny lateral crests, apex obtusely pointed and slightly setose. Phallus large, laterally flattened, at posterior ⅖ of ventral margin dorsally bent at about 30 degrees, distinctly concave at ⅗, then almost straight, distally pointed; ductus ejaculatorius enters ante-dorsally; longitudinal sclerite large, distally tapering, end pointed; vesica with crescent-shaped, granulose cushion.

Figures 3, 4. 

Adults of D. dolomiella Huemer, sp. nov.: 3. Male, paratype; 4. Female, holotype; photographs P. Huemer.

Figures 5, 6. 

Adults of Dichomeris species: 5. Female, D. juniperella (Linnaeus, 1761), Austria, Nordtirol; 6. Male, D. marginella (Fabricius, 1781), Austria, Niederösterreich; photographs P. Huemer.

Figures 7, 8. 

Male genitalia of Dichomeris species: 7. D. carpatiella sp. nov., paratype, Romania, Parâng Mountains, genitalia slide Buchner m3910, photograph P. Buchner; 8. D. dolomiella sp. nov., paratype, genitalia slide P. Huemer GEL1382, photograph P. Huemer.

Figures 9, 10. 

Male genitalia of Dichomeris species: 9. D. juniperella, Romania, Ciuc Mountains, genitalia slide Buchner m3912; 10. D. marginella, Austria, Hundsheim, genitalia slide Buchner m436; photographs P. Buchner.

Figures 11–23. 

Details of the male genitalia of Dichomeris species, compared: 11–14. Uncus, 15–18. Juxta lobes, 19–23. Phallus, 11, 15, 19. D. carpatiella sp. nov., holotype, Romania, Făgăraș Mountains, genitalia slide Buchner m3915; 12, 16, 21. D. dolomiella sp. nov., paratype, same data as Fig. 8; 13, 17, 22. D. juniperella, Romania, Harghita Mountains, genitalia slide Buchner m3738; 14, 18, 23. D. marginella, same data as Fig. 10; 20. D. carpatiella sp. nov., paratype, same data as Fig. 7; photographs 11, 13–15, 17–20, 22–23 P. Buchner, 12, 16, 21 P. Huemer.

Variation (n = 4): apex of juxta lobes may be slightly more pointed.

Female genitalia (Figs 24, 28). Oviscapt weakly extensible; papilla analis slightly longer than segment Ⅷ, weakly sclerotised and densely covered with medium-long and long setae. Posterior apophysis almost twice as long as papilla analis, rod-like, slender, strongly sclerotised. Segment Ⅷ twice as broad as long, with row of sparse setae along posterior margin. Anterior apophysis slightly shorter than segment Ⅷ, rod-like, slender, strongly sclerotised. Ostium bursae slightly broader than half the width of segment Ⅷ, antrum distally slightly widened. Colliculum with sclerotised, complex sclerite, smaller part in ductus bursae, larger part in posterior part of corpus bursae and extending into basally sclerotised ductus seminalis; arched anterior margin of the sclerite unevenly curved and interrupted to ductus seminalis; ductus seminalis connected postero-laterally on the right side. Corpus bursae membranous, as wide as segment Ⅷ and twice as long; the exit area of accessory sack from corpus bursae membranous with two tiny sclerites; accessory sack connected postero-ventrally, small, its diameter ⅔ of the width of segment Ⅷ.

Figures 24, 25. 

Female genitalia of Dichomeris species: 24. D. carpatiella sp. nov., paratype, Romania, Făgăraș Mountains, genitalia slide Buchner w3914, photograph P. Buchner, 25. D. dolomiella sp. nov., paratype, genitalia slide P. Huemer GEL 1383, photograph P. Huemer.

Figures 26, 27. 

Female genitalia of Dichomeris species: 26. D. juniperella, Romania, Harghita Mountains, genitalia slide Buchner w3909; 27. D. marginella, Austria, Hundsheim, genitalia slide Buchner w437; photographs P. Buchner.

Figures 28–31. 

Details of the female genitalia of Dichomeris species, colliculum and exit area of accessory bursa, compared: 28. D. carpatiella sp. nov., paratype, Romania, Parâng Mountains, genit. slide Buchner w3911; 29. D. dolomiella sp. nov., paratype, same data as Fig. 25; 30. D. juniperella, same data as Fig. 26; 31. D. marginella, same data as Fig. 27; photographs 28, 30–31 P. Buchner, 29 P. Huemer.

Variation (n = 2): tiny sclerites of the exit area of accessory sack may be absent (Fig. 28).

Diagnosis.

Dichomeris carpatiella sp. nov. is a large, grey gelechiid species with black and whitish grey mottling, two black discal and one or two plical spots, a whitish grey post-median costal spot, a white interstigmatic patch and an indistinct row of up to nine black terminal spots. In the external morphology of the adult, the grey ground colour differs from the similar D. dolomiella sp. nov., whereas the basally narrower forewing, with a more oblique termen and the indistinct transverse fascia differ from D. juniperella. D. marginella markedly differs in wing colour and pattern (Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). In the male genitalia the slightly concave apex of the uncus and the juxta with the left lobe 1.25 times longer than right differ from the related species (Figs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). In the female genitalia the arched anterior margin of the sclerite unevenly curved and interrupted to the ductus seminalis differs from the similar congeners (Figs 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). For more details see Table 1. Additionally, all species show a significant divergence in the DNA barcode of around 4% p-distance (Fig. 32). The external appearance of both new species at a first glance also resembles Athrips mouffetella (Linnaeus, 1758) (Gelechiidae), but the latter species clearly differs by the broader forewing, the presence of two black discal spots at ⅗ of the wing, the falcate labial palp with black and whitish ringed segment 3; and in different habitats at lower altitudes.

Figure 32. 

Neighbour-joining tree of Dichomeris carpatiella sp. nov. (BIN BOLD:AFZ7686)¸ D. dolomiella sp. nov. (BIN BOLD:AAU1435) and the closest related congeners D. marginella (BIN BOLD:AAC4900) and D. juniperella (BIN BOLD:AAF5665), with Anasphaltis renigerellus (Zeller, 1839) (BIN BOLD:AAV9730) as outgroup.

Table 1.

The main diagnostic characters of Dichomeris species, compared.

characters/taxa D. carpatiella sp. nov. D. dolomiella sp. nov. D. juniperella D. marginella
external morphology: size on average (wingspan) 15.5–19 mm 16–approx. 20 mm 18–21 mm 15–17 mm
ground colour grey brownish grey [but based on rather worn material] varies from grey to brownish grey ochreous brown
markings 2 discal, 1–2 plical and row of black terminal spots, whitish grey postmedian costal spot 2 discal spots, 1 plical streak, row of black terminal spots, whitish grey scales towards base and termen 2 discal and 2 plical black spots, whitish grey postmedian transverse line large and wide white streaks along costa and dorsal margin
male genitalia: apex of uncus slightly concave convex convex convex
valva unevenly widening unevenly widening unevenly widening evenly widening
sacculus apex tapering apex rounded apex rounded apex rounded
asymmetric juxta lobes left 1.25 times longer than right left 1.2 times longer than right left 1.1 times longer than right left 1.1 times longer than right
phallus slender, distally pointed slender, distally pointed wide, distally rounded wide, distally pointed
female genitalia: antrum slender slender broad slender
sclerite of colliculum small small large small
arched anterior margin of sclerite unevenly curved, interrupted to the ductus seminalis sharp, distinct, evenly curved, uninterrupted to the ductus seminalis widely folded to the ductus seminalis flattened
exit area of accessory sack membranous or with 2 tiny sclerites membranous weakly sclerotised with 2 large semi-circular sclerites

Molecular data (Fig. 32).

Three successfully barcoded specimens of D. carpatiella sp. nov. (one with a shorter sequence of 407 bp) from two localities, resulted in 0% intraspecific divergence and clustered in a unique BIN (see Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013) BOLD:AFZ7686. The nearest neighbour is D. dolomiella sp. nov. (BIN BOLD:AAU1435) at 3.69% minimum p-distance. The related taxa, D. marginella (BIN BOLD:AAC4900) and D. juniperella (BIN BOLD:AAF5665), differ by a minimum 4.01% and 4.49% p-distance respectively.

Distribution.

So far only known from four localities in the Southern Carpathians, the alpine regions of the Făgăraș, Cibin, Parâng and Retezat Mountains (Romania).

Biology.

The host-plant is Juniperus communis L. Current knowledge of immature stages is limited: the larva lives among needles in silken, slightly elongate, indistinct spinnings on the end of the twigs in sheltered south-facing situations; it may hibernate once or twice; it pupates in the spring within the spinning. Spinnings are indistinct, but the needles of the old spinnings wither and become clearly visible and may indicate the presence of putative new spinnings on the new growth at the end of the twig. The larva resembles that of D. marginella and D. juniperella, but was not examined in detail. The habitats are exposed alpine scree with junipers (Fig. 33). Univoltine. Adults are on the wing from the middle of June to the end of July, highly dependent on general weather conditions. However, the flying period might not be longer than 2–3 weeks: in 2024, a year with an unusual early spring, the collecting site in the Făgăraș Mountains was visited twice, the first time on 12 June when adults were not found, but adults emerged from spinnings collected with pupae between 18 and 23 June; on 12 July, on the second site visit, again no adults were observed. In contrast, one of the records from the Retezat Mountains dates from mid-August. The adults can be beaten from their host-plants. Once disturbed, they fly very fast, up to about 4–5 m above the ground and follow a sinuous route. Males may fly longer distances, up to tens of metres, females usually less, then suddenly hide within junipers or other vegetation.

Figures 33, 34. 

Habitats of Dichomeris species: 33. D. carpatiella sp. nov., Romania, Eastern Carpathians, Făgăraș Mountains, Iezerul Caprei, 2100 m, 21.ⅶ.2022, photograph Z. Kovács; 34. D. dolomiella sp. nov., Italy, Udine, Monte Canin N, environs of Rifugio Gilberti, 11.ⅷ.2013, photograph H. Deutsch.

Parasitoid.

In 2024 three Pimpla turionellae (Linnaeus, 1758) (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) emerged from the pupae which were identified by DNA barcoding ([DNA sample] TLMF_Lep_38688).

Etymology.

The specific name is a feminine adjective derived from the name of the Carpathians, the mountain range where the new Dichomeris species was discovered.

Dichomeris dolomiella Huemer, sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 21, 25, 29

Material examined.

Holotype: ITALY • ♀; Prov. Udine, Monte Canin N, Rif. Gilberti Umg.; alt. 1850–1900 m; 29 Jul. 2001; genitalia slide GEL 1384♀ P. Huemer; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF.

Paratypes: ITALY • 2 ♂; Italia sept., Südtirol, Schluderbach, Cimabanche; 46°37'34"N, 12°11'21"E; alt. 1530 m; 21 Jul. 2013; [DNA samples] TLMF Lep 12409, TLMF Lep 12410; genitalia slide GEL 1382♂ P. Huemer; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF. • 1 ♀; I[taly], Friuli V[enezia] Giulia UM 65, Udine: Pontebba: Biotopo Torbiera di Pramollo, torbiera; bosco – al lume; alt. 1520 m; 28 Jul. 2001; [DNA sample] BC TLMF Lep 03831; genitalia slide GEL 1383♀ P. Huemer; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF. • 1 ♂, 2 ♀; Tyrolis, Ortler; 16 Jul. [18]99; genitalia slide B. Tóth 2456m, 2457f; [ex] coll. Krone; HNHM.

Description.

Adult, male (Fig. 3). Head: smooth, covered with black scales ventrally and laterally around the eye; frons curved, covered with whitish grey scales; vertex covered with whitish grey scales with pure white lateral sides; ocellus distinct; compound eye large; antenna ⅔ the length of forewing, with scape and pedicellus ventrally whitish grey, dorsally mid-brown, flagellum dark brown, ciliate; proboscis well developed, brownish grey, scaled; maxillary palp tiny, brownish grey; segment 1 of labial palp short and covered with greyish brown scales, segment 2 long with tuft of long, basally light brown and distally greyish brown scales projecting forwards and upwards, dorsal surface and upper part of outer and inner surface whitish, segment 3 long, pointing upwards, with light brown lower and whitish grey upper surface, apex dark brown. Thorax and tegula covered with brownish grey scales. Wingspan from 17 to approx. 20 mm. Forewing length 8–9.5 mm. Forewing sub-triangular, ratio (calculated by the width divided by length) 0.26. Forewing covered with brownish grey scales mixed with whitish grey scales on costal base, in middle of wing and in the post-median and apical areas; two black, rounded discal spots at about ⅖ and ⅗ with whitish grey scales between, one black and short plical streak at about ⅖ of fold with whitish grey scales towards base and termen; variable number of indistinct black dots on costa from post-median costal spot towards apex and terminal dots from apex toward tornus. Fringes black around apex, along termen whitish grey with two distinct black terminal lines, plain whitish grey to tornus.

Hindwing broadly trapezoidal, ratio 0.30, apex short and pointed, termen below apex sinuate, grey, fringes whitish grey with two indistinct black terminal lines.

Underside brownish grey, fringes similar, but with yellowish base and with two indistinct black dividing lines. Legs brownish grey, dorsally with some yellowish grey scales.

Abdomen grey.

Variation: Pattern elements and coloration of the wings, especially the extent of pale scaling, show a partly artificial range of variation and are only faintly discernible in the worn paratype (Fig. 3).

Female (Fig. 4). Head with appendages and thorax as in male; flagellum with shorter cilia. Smaller than male, with wingspan 16–18 mm (n = 3), forewing length of 7.5–8.5 mm; forewing sub-triangular, narrow (ratio 0.25), hindwing broadly trapezoidal (ratio 0.31); wing colour and pattern similar to male.

Remarks.

The small number of partially worn specimens, and additionally the different preparation methods (ranging from simply pinned to spread out) do not allow any definitive conclusions to be drawn about the range of variation within the species.

Male genitalia (Figs 8, 12, 16, 21). Uncus fused with tegumen, of medium length, hood-like, apex slightly convex, slightly rounded and spinose. Uncus with a pair of tiny pinnacles (socii) laterally, each bearing a strong hair. Gnathos basally with pair of crook-shaped lateral processes, gnathos-hook falcate, slightly angulated. Culcitula covered with microspines. Tegumen short with flap-like teguminal lobes. Parateguminal sclerites a pair of small, dorsally oriented, distally rounded and setose lobes. Parateguminal hair-sack indistinct, with coremata. Valva long, truncate with longitudinal fold, basally narrow, distally slightly widening, then abruptly widening at ½, distal half wide, apically rounded and setose. Sacculus short, wide and setose, with slightly curved uneven margins, apex rounded. Vinculum long and narrow, ventrally projecting. Juxta a pair of long and asymmetric lobes, basally fused with medial vinculum, left process 1.2 times as long as right, both slightly sinuous, at ¾ with tiny lateral crests, distally acutely pointed and slightly setose. Phallus slender, laterally flattened, posterior ⅓ of ventral margin slightly concave, at ⅓ dorsally bent at about 30 degrees, then slightly sinuous, distally pointed; ductus ejaculatorius enters ante-dorsally; longitudinal sclerite large, distally tapering, pointed apex; vesica with crescent-shaped, granulose cushion.

Variation (n = 2): unknown.

Female genitalia (Figs 25, 29). Oviscapt weakly extensible; papilla analis slightly longer than segment Ⅷ, weakly sclerotised and densely covered with medium-long and long setae. Posterior apophysis 1.5 times as long as papilla analis, rod-like, slender, strongly sclerotised. Segment Ⅷ 1.5 times as broad as long, with row of sparse setae along posterior margin. Anterior apophysis slightly shorter than segment Ⅷ, rod-like, slender, strongly sclerotised. Ostium bursae ⅔ as broad as width of segment Ⅷ, antrum distally slightly widened. Colliculum with a complex sclerite, shorter part in ductus bursae, larger part in posterior part of corpus bursae, extending into basally sclerotised ductus seminalis; widely arched anterior margin of sclerite sharp and distinct, evenly curved and uninterrupted to the ductus seminalis; ductus seminalis connected postero-laterally on right side. Corpus bursae membranous, slightly wider than segment Ⅷ and almost three times as long as wide; exit area of accessory sack from corpus bursae membranous; accessory sack connected postero-ventrally.

Variation (n = 3): no variation observed.

Diagnosis.

Dichomeris dolomiella sp. nov. is a large brownish grey gelechiid species with mixed whitish grey scales and black markings: two discal spots, one plical streak and a variable number of terminal spots. In the external morphology of the adult the brownish grey ground colour differs from the similar D. carpatiella sp. nov., whereas the basally narrower forewing, with a more oblique termen differ from D. juniperella. D. marginella markedly differs in wing colour and pattern (Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). In the male genitalia the slightly convex apex of the uncus and the juxta with the left lobe 1.2 times longer than right differs from the related species (Figs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). In the female genitalia the sharp and distinct, evenly curved and to the ductus seminalis uninterrupted widely arched anterior margin of the sclerite differs from the similar congeners (Figs 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). For more details see Table 1. Additionally, all species show a significant divergence in the DNA barcode of around 4% p-distance (Fig. 32). The external appearance at first glance also resembles Athrips mouffetella (Linnaeus, 1758), for details see D. carpatiella sp. nov. above.

Molecular data (Fig. 32).

Three successfully barcoded specimens of D. dolomiella sp. nov. grouped in a unique BIN (BIN BOLD:AAU1435), with 0% intraspecific divergence and a minimum p-distance of 3.69% to the nearest neighbour D. carpatiella sp. nov. (BIN BOLD:AFZ7686). The minimum p-distance of D. dolomiella sp. nov. to D. marginella is 5.25% and to D. juniperella 5.9%.

Distribution.

Dichomeris dolomiella sp. nov. is only known from the south-eastern Alps of Italy, with a few records from the provinces of Bolzano-Südtirol and Udine. It is likely that the species had already been collected by Mann in 1876 near Schluderbach and listed as D. juniperella by Mann and Rogenhofer (1877).

Biology.

Host-plant and early stages are unknown, though the new species is almost certainly associated with Juniperus spp. The recently collected adults have so far only been collected at light, usually in high montane to subalpine dwarf shrub communities on scree-rich dolomite substrate, and at one location also in a raised bog with dwarf shrubs including Juniperus (Fig. 34). The flight period appears to be narrowly limited, with all records dating from the second half of July.

Etymology.

The specific name is a feminine adjective derived from the Dolomites, the mountain range where the new species was discovered.

Dichomeris juniperella (Linnaeus, 1761). ROMANIA: 6 ♂, 5 ♀, Eastern Carpathians, Harghita Mountains, Băile Jigodin, 650 m, genitalia slide Buchner w3909, 29.ⅶ.1999 (Fig. 26); 2 ♂, 2 ♀, Eastern Carpathians, Ciuc Mountains, Racu, Cseretető, 750 m, genitalia prep. 2465/♂/ Kovács (= slide Buchner m3912), 5.ⅷ.2005 (Fig. 9); 1 ♂, Idem, 6.ⅷ.2005; 1 ♂, Eastern Carpathians, Harghita Mountains, Nagyos valley, 1000 m, [DNA sample] TLMF Lep 38529, genitalia slide Buchner m3738, 1.ⅷ.2022 (Figs 13, 17, 22); 1 ♂, Idem, 4.ⅷ.2022; 1 ♀, Idem, ex pupa, 8.ⅷ.2022 (pupa 4.ⅷ.2022, Juniperus); 1 ♂, Eastern Carpathians, Ciuc Depression, Șumuleu (Miercurea Ciuc), 700 m, 22.ⅷ.2011; 1 ♀, Eastern Carpathians, Ciuc Mountains, Szép-fej, 950 m, 1.ⅷ.2023, all S. & Z. Kovács leg. & coll. GERMANY: 1 ♂, Württemberg, Schwäbische Alb, Buttenhausen, 730 m, 28.ⅶ.1975, L. Süssner leg.; 1 ♀, Idem, but 720 m, 4.ⅷ.1977, all coll. TLMF. ITALY: 1 ♂, Friuli Venezia Giulia, UM 24, prov. Udine, Ampezzo, Biotopo Palude di Cima Corso, 840 m, 12.ⅶ.2001, P. Huemer leg., [DNA sample] TLMF Lep 03832; 1 ♂, Friuli Venezia Giulia, prov. Pordenone, Val Cimoliana, 1050 m, 23.ⅶ.2009, H. Deutsch leg., [DNA sample] TLMF Lep 24311; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, prov. Udine, V. Rio d. Lago, 1000 m, 8.ⅷ.1987, P. Huemer leg.; 1 ♂, prov. Torino, PN Orsiera – Rocciavrè, Meana di Susa, Colle delle Finestre N, 45°4'33"N, 7°3'7"E, 2130 m, 16.ⅶ.2022, P. Huemer leg., [DNA sample] TLMF_Lep_33363, all coll. TLMF. AUSTRIA: 2 ♂, Nordtirol, Weißenbach, Errachau, 920 m, 27.ⅵ.1989; 1 ♀, Nordtirol, Matrei, 1400 m, 13.ⅷ.1953 e.l., K. Burmann leg. (Fig. 5); 1 ♀, Nordtirol, Arzleralm, 1100 m, 21. ⅶ.1971 e.l., K. Burmann leg., all coll. TLMF. SWITZERLAND: 3 ♂, Graubünden, Berninapass, 2400 m, 23.ⅶ.1992, P. Huemer & G. Tarmann leg., all coll. TLMF.

Dichomeris marginella (Fabricius, 1781). AUSTRIA: 1 ♂, Hundsheim, Hexenberg, 48°08'N, 16°56'E, 300 m, 3.ⅶ.2019, WS33274, genitalia slide Buchner m436 (Figs 6, 14, 18, 23); 1 ♀, Hundsheim, Hexenberg, 48°08'N, 16°56'E, 300 m, 22.ⅵ.2021, WS39385, genitalia slide Buchner w437 (Figs 27, 31), all W. Stark leg. & coll.; 1 ♂, Hundsheim, 9.ⅵ.1967 e.l., E. Arenberger leg. (Fig. 6), coll. TLMF. ITALY: 1 ♂, Südtirol, Schnalstal, 800 m, early ⅶ.1967, F. Zürnbauer leg.; 2 ♀, Südtirol, Naturns, mid ⅵ.1966, F. Zürnbauer leg.; 1 ♂, prov. Verona, Monte, 300 m, 7.vii.1986, K. Burmann leg.; 1 ♀, Friuli Venezia Giulia, prov. Udine, Trasaghis, Tagliamento, 180 m, 3.ⅸ.2016, H. Deutsch leg.; 1 ♀, Friuli Venezia Giulia, prov. Udine, Cornino, Tagliamento, 180 m, 14.viii.1998, H. Deutsch leg., all coll. TLMF. FRANCE: 2 ♂, Bras-d'Asse, 500 m, early ⅶ.1967, F. Zürnbauer leg.; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Oreison, 600 m, late ⅶ.1970, F. Zürnbauer leg.; 1 ♂, Villar St. Crèpin, 2.vii.2002, J. Nel leg., all coll. TLMF. GERMANY: 2 ♂, Bayern, Obermenzing, late ⅶ.1954, H. Pfister leg.; 1 ♂, Bayern, Laabertal, 360 m, late ⅶ.1972, F. Zürnbauer leg., all coll. TLMF. SLOVENIA: 1 ♂, Podgorski kras, Praproce, Prärie, 490 m, 6.ⅵ.2012, H. Habeler leg.; 1 ♀, Umg. Trnovo, Kucelj, 1100 m, 27.ⅵ.1998, H. Habeler leg., all coll. TLMF. CROATIA: 1 ♂, Krk, Umg. Punat, MEW, 29.ⅷ.1990, H. Habeler leg.; 1 ♀, Krk, Punat, Friedhofberg, 23.ⅶ.1996, H. Habeler leg.; 1 ♂, Cres, 7 km SE Osor, 16.v.1996, F. Lichtenberger leg.; 1 ♀, Istrien, Rovinj Umg., 30 m, 17.ⅵ.1995, H. Deutsch leg., all coll. TLMF. SPAIN: 1 ♀, Aragon, prov. Lleida, Puente de Montanana, 15.ⅶ.2012, leg. P. Huemer & T. Mayr; 1 ♂, Aragon, Canfranc-Estacion, 1320 m, 13.ⅶ.2012, P. Huemer leg., all coll. TLMF. TÜRKIYE: 1 ♂, Kizilcahamam, 952 m, 23.-24.ⅵ.1969, G. Friedel leg., coll, TLMF.

Discussion

With nearly 900 described species, Gelechiidae is one of the most diverse lepidopteran families in Europe (Huemer and Karsholt 2020). However, comprehensive genetic surveys of DNA barcodes indicate a surprisingly large amount of potential cryptic diversity, with no fewer than 65 clusters with a unique, unidentified BIN, as well as 114 nominal species with more than one BIN (Huemer et al. 2020). The main reason for this deficit in the inventory of the fauna is the continued lack of taxonomic revisions in some groups. Comprehensive monographic studies are currently only available for parts of the Gelechiinae (Gnorimoschemini, Litini, Gelechiini) (Huemer and Karsholt 1999, 2010), and are lacking for the species-rich subfamilies Anacampsinae, Anomologinae, Aristoteliinae and Dichomeridinae, as well as the less diverse Thiotrichinae and genera recently classified as Gelechiini, such as Sophronia Hübner, 1825. Although some revisions are now available even within the groups not yet covered in the “Microlepidoptera of Europe” book series, these often covers species-poor genera, but occasionally also diverse groups such as Bryotropha Heinemann, 1870 (Karsholt and Rutten 2005) and Megacraspedus Zeller, 1839 (Huemer and Karsholt 2018). Conversely, however, some important genera such as Stomopteryx Heinemann, 1870, Aproaerema Durrant, 1897, Chrysoesthia Hübner, 1825, Aristotelia Hübner, 1825, Isophrictis Meyrick, 1917, Monochroa Heinemann, 1870 and Oxypteryx Rebel, 1911 are in urgent need of revision.

The genus Dichomeris appears to have been comparatively well studied, and of the 19 indigenous species recorded in Europe, only two species, Dichomeris merceae Gastón, Macià, Ylla & Bau, 2022 (Gastón et al. 2022) and D. vivesi Falck & Karsholt, 2026 (Falck and Karsholt 2026), were described after the mid-20th century. The discovery of two previously unnamed species is therefore surprising.

Both new discoveries are morphologically cryptic and have therefore been overlooked. In the external morphology the two new species resemble D. juniperella, only differing slightly in the ground colour, and the genitalia—particularly in the male sex—are very similar to other related species, even to the externally strikingly different D. marginella. In addition to rather subtle diagnostic features in morphology—except in the female genitalia—the new species seem to differ from related taxa in their ecological preferences, particularly in their altitudinal distribution: D. carpatiella sp. nov. is a characteristic species of the alpine zone, at 2000–2300 m, of the Romanian Carpathians, D. dolomiella sp. nov. occurs at lower altitudes from about 1500 to nearly 2000 m, but still in the subalpine zone of the south-eastern Alps. D. juniperella on the contrary inhabits the mountain zone, between 650 and 1000 m in the Carpathians whereas in the Alps it is found from lower valleys of ca 600 m up to more than 2400 m (western part of the Alps). In northern Europe this species generally occurs at lower altitudes (Gregersen and Karsholt 2022: 149). Similarly, D. marginella prefers lowland habitats up to 300–400 m, although we have also seen material from localities up to 1300 m. We are not aware of any sympatric occurrence of species of this complex in the Carpathians and in the Alps. However, in the south-eastern Alps D. dolomiella sp. nov. and D. juniperella habitats are sometimes separated only by a few kilometres. Similarly, D. juniperella and D. marginella are known from neighbouring localities in Denmark (Gregersen and Karsholt 2022).

Both new species seem to be restricted to areas particularly rich in endemism. The Southern Carpathians seem to be an epicentre of the Carpathian endemics, the new species shares its habitat with other endemic Lepidoptera, e.g.: Dahlica (Siederia) baleaca Weidlich, 2017 (Psychidae), Phtheochroa carpatiana Kovács, Kovács, Zlatkov & Huemer, 2021, Cochylimorpha bucegiana Kovács, Kovács & Buchner, 2024, Dichrorampha carpatalpina Kovács & Kovács, 2019 (Tortricidae), Catoptria orientellus (Herrich-Schäffer, [1855]) (Crambidae) and Boloria pales carpathomeridionalis Crosson & Popescu-Gorj, 1963 (Nymphalidae). Similarly, the south-eastern Alps harbour numerous endemic Lepidoptera. An overview by Huemer (1998) lists 31 regionally endemic species from the Gardesan-illyrische zone—an area of endemism which covers a major part of the south-eastern Alps. Furthermore 39 more widely distributed alpine endemic species are known from this part of the Alps. Due to the restricted distribution of the new species in this zone and the conversely large genetic distances to related species, it can be assumed that it is an old relict that migrated from the south over short distances during the postglacial period. Conversely, the few occurrences of Dichomeris juniperella in the Southern Alps and the absence of this species in the Mediterranean region indicate different glacial refugia north of the Alps and postglacial recolonisation routes to the north, which were hampered by the Alpine arc to the south (Hewitt 2008).

The single old record of D. juniperella from Transylvania (Romania) is that of Czekelius (1901), which, considering the label data of the D. carpatiella sp. nov. paratypes from the HNHM, certainly refers to the latter species and not to D. juniperella: “Ypsolophus juniperellus L. Zibinsgebirge 24. Juli 1900. Das Vorkommen ist an juniperus nana gebunden. Die Raupe spinnt die Zweigspitzen fest zusammen zu walnussgrossen Knollen, die aussen grün bleiben; innerhalb derselben verpuppt sie sich und giebt nach acht bis zehn Tagen den Schmetterling.”

Acknowledgements

Wolfgang Stark (Trübensee, Austria) kindly helped with loan of material and sharing of DNA barcoding data, and Helmut Deutsch (Bannberg, Austria) with a habitat photograph. ZK expresses his gratitude to Zsolt Bálint, Gergely Katona and Balázs Tóth (HNHM, Budapest, Hungary) for their hospitality and kind help during his study at the HNHM. We are most grateful to Paul D. N. Hebert and the team at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB, Guelph, Canada) for the sequence analyses. We are especially indebted to Robert J. Heckford (Plympton, UK), Stella D. Beavan (Zeal Monachorum, UK) and Mark J. Sterling (London, UK) for their valuable help with linguistic corrections and improvement of the manuscript. We are grateful for constructive comments and suggestions of the editor, Théo Léger, and the two reviewers, Lauri Kaila and Ole Karsholt.

References

  • deWaard JR, Ivanova NV, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN (2008) Assembling DNA barcodes: Analytical Protocols. In: Martin C (Ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology: Environmental Genomics. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-548-0_15
  • Falck P, Karsholt O (2026) Gelechiidae of the Canary Islands (Spain). Part 2. Dichomeridinae, Anomologinae (= Apatetrinae auct.), Thiotrichinae (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 54(213): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.1116
  • Gastón J, Macià R, Ylla J, Bau J (2022) Análisis del complejo Dichomeris rasilella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854) y descripción de una nueva especie para España (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 50(198): 277–288. https://shilap.org/revista/article/view/136
  • Gregersen K, Karsholt O (2022) The Gelechiidae of North-West Europe. Norwegian Entomological Society, Oslo, Norway, 939 pp.
  • Huemer P, Karsholt O (1999) Gelechiidae I (Gelechiinae: Teleiodini, Gelechiini). In: Huemer P, Karsholt O, Lyneborg L (Eds) Microlepidoptera of Europe 3. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 356 pp. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004629028
  • Huemer P, Karsholt O (2010) Gelechiidae Ⅱ (Gelechiinae: Gnorimoschemini). In: Huemer P, Karsholt O, Nuss M (Eds) Microlepidoptra of Europe 6. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 586 pp. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260986
  • Huemer P, Karsholt O (2018) Revision of the genus Megacraspedus Zeller, 1839, a challenging taxonomic tightrope of species delimitation (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). ZooKeys 800: 1–278. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.800.26292
  • Huemer P, Karsholt O, Aarvik L, Berggren K, Bidzilya O, Junnilainen J, Landry J-F, Mutanen M, Nupponen K, Segerer A, Šumpich J, Wieser C, Wiesmair B, Hebert PDN (2020) DNA barcode library for European Gelechiidae (Lepidoptera) suggests greatly underestimated species diversity. ZooKeys 921: 141–157. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.921.49199
  • Kovács Z, Kovács S (2022) An overview of the Romanian Gelechiidae (Lepidoptera) summarizing the current knowledge in an updated and annotated checklist. Entomologica Romanica 26: 1–76. https://doi.org/10.24193/entomolrom.26.1
  • Pitkin LM (1986) A technique for the preparation of complex male genitalia in Microlepidoptera. Entomologist’s Gazette 37: 173–179.
  • Robinson G (1976) The preparation of slides of Lepidoptera genitalia with special reference to the Microlepidoptera. Entomologist’s Gazette 27: 127–132.
login to comment