Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ole Karsholt ( okarsholt@snm.ku.dk ) Academic editor: Vazrick Nazari
© 2018 Oleksiy Bidzilya, Ole Karsholt.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Bidzilya O, Karsholt O (2018) Two new species of Ephysteris Meyrick, 1908, from Asia with brachypterous males (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). Nota Lepidopterologica 41(1): 107-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.41.23395
|
Two new species of Gelechiidae: Ephysteris kullbergi sp. n. from Tuva (Russia) and Ephysteris ustjuzhanini sp. n. from Mongolia are described. In both species the hindwings in both sexes are distinctly reduced. The adults and genitalia are illustrated. Brachyptery in Gelechiidae and Ephysteris is briefly discussed, and type locality of E. kullbergi sp. n. is illustrated. The locomotion of E. kullbergi sp. n. is described.
The genus Ephysteris Meyrick, 1908, comprises about 60 predominately Old World species (
Most Palaearctic species of Ephysteris constitute a quite homogeneous group and they were united in the subgenus Microcraspedus Janse, 1958 (= Opacopsis Povolný, 1964), based on similarities in the genitalia (
Within the GnorimoscheminiEphysteris is closely related to Vladimirea Povolný, 1967, but differs in having a narrower tegumen, relatively short valva and often more or less modified segment VIII in the male genitalia. The female genitalia are characterized by the sub-triangular signum with distinctly produced apices in combination with the usually long sclerotized posterior portion of the ductus bursae.
Generic relationships among Gnorimoschemini are not fully understood and synapomorphic characters are putative at best. Species of Ephysteris share the long sacculus (1/2–3/4 length of valva) and the well-developed gnathos with Vladimirea and Microlechia Turati, 1924, but differ from the former in the short valva (considerably shorter than the length of tegumen and uncus), longer and narrower saccus, and often more or less modified segment VIII in the male genitalia. Microlechia species differ from Ephysteris in the longer, sickle-shaped gnathos, the sub-ovate uncus and the apically pointed sacculus.
In both male and female Ephysteris the hindwings of some species can be reduced, being distinctly shorter, either elongate without distinct emargination of the termen or broader with a rounded margin. Several veins are lost (
Holotype, ♂. “RUSSIA Tuva rep. 50°01’N, 95°03’E, 1150 m, Lake Tere-Khol, sand dunes 9.–12.6.1995 Jalava & Kullberg leg.” “genitalia slide 153/16, O. Bidzilya” (
Paratypes. 29 ♂, 14 ♀, same data as holotype, genitalia slides 4873♂ and 4874♀ O. Karsholt (
Adult (Figs
Female. Hindwing shorter, length 1.0–1.7 mm, and broader than in male; otherwise similar to male.
Variation. There is some variation in the amount of light and dark scales in the forewings. Worn specimens tend to look paler than fresh ones. There is some variation in the length and shape (more or less rounded) of the hindwing in the females.
Male genitalia (Fig.
Female genitalia (Fig.
1–4. Ephysteris kullbergi sp. n. 1. Adult, holotype, male. 2. Adult, paratype, female. 3. Male genitalia, holotype (gen. slide 153/16, O. Bidzilya). 3a. Phallus. 3b. Abdominal segment VIII (gen. slide 4873, O. Karsholt). 4. Female genitalia (gen. slide 4874, O. Karsholt). 4a. Corpus bursae. 4b. Signum enlarged. 5, 6. Ephysteris ustjuzhanini sp. n. 5. Adult, holotype, male. 6. Male genitalia (gen. slide 210/14, O. Bidzilya). 6a. Phallus.
E. kullbergi is characterized by the reduced hindwings in both sexes. It can be separated from other brachypterous Ephysteris species by the more vivid coloration and the many erect brown and black scales in the forewing. The female genitalia are similar to those of several congeners, especially E. diminutella (Zeller, 1847) and E. insulella (Heinemann, 1870), but can be recognized in having the antrum slightly exceeding the apophysis anterioris, and by the short and broad anteriolateral lobes of the signum. The male genitalia are similar to those of several congeners, especially E. diminutella, but can be recognized by having shorter valvae, saccus and phallus and less emarginated posterior margin of the vinculum.
Russia: Tuva Republic.
Host-plant and early stages are unknown. The adults have been collected in the first half of June. According to Jaakko Kullberg (in litt.) “These Ephysteris moths were collected with two light traps with tube lamps. The container and funnel were dug in the sandy dunes… The moths start to arrive to the trap in the dusk and were running and jumping in the trap and sheets. The leaps were huge - even 20–25 cm long and as I remember the moths did not use wings when doing it”.
The type locality (Figs
The new species is named in honour of one of its collectors, Jaakko Kullberg, Finland.
The type locality of E. kullbergi is spelled “Tore Khol” on some maps (
In the mention of this species
Holotype, ♂, “Mongolia, Mongolsky Altai, 60 km SE of Khovd, Khar-Us-Nuur Lake, h-1300 m, 19.vi.1999, P. Ustjuzhanin “genitalia slide 210/14, O. Bidzilya” (
Description. Adult (Fig.
Female. Similar to male except for the following: forewing slightly longer (wingspan 9.0 mm) and broader (the length is 2.5 times its width in the middle), ground colour is lighter (cream rather than light brown), head white, thorax and tegulae cream rather than grey.
Male genitalia (Fig.
Female genitalia. Unknown.
E. ustjuzhanini is characterized by the forewings being strongly broadened in the middle together with very short hindwings that are the shortest among brachypterous Ephysteris species. The male genitalia are characterized by the vincular process having a comparatively long and strongly pointed distal projection. This projection is longer in E. curtipennis and E. brachyptera and missing in E. kullbergi.
Mongolia.
Host-plant unknown. Adults have been collected in June.
The new species is named after its collector Petr Ustjuzhanin, Russia, a specialist of the Pterophoridae and Alucitidae.
Despite the differences between the male and female we are inclined to treat both specimens as the same species based on the general similarity of the forewing pattern.
Hypotheses relating to brachyptery and its function in species of Lepidoptera are not uniform and each case should be looked at on its own merit (
In Lepidoptera wing reduction is rare, being known from less than 1% of the described species (
We are most grateful to Jaakko Kullberg, Helsinki, Finland, and Petr Ustjuzhanin, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia, for collecting these remarkable moths and giving us the opportunity to study them, and for information and photographs of the type localities. We are moreover indebted to Klaus Sattler, Natural History Museum, London, U.K. for help and advice and to Lauri Kaila, Finnish Museum of Natural History, LUOMUS, for loan of material. Robert J. (Bob) Heckford, Plympton, U.K. kindly corrected the English language and improved the manuscript. Mark Metz, Washington D.C., USA, and Klaus Sattler made useful suggestions, which improved the manuscript.