Print
A new species of Pharmacis Hübner, 1820 from Spain with a brief review of the genera Pharmacis and Korscheltellus Börner, 1920 (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae)
expand article infoAxel Kallies, Teresa Farino§
‡ University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
§ Iberian Wildlife, Potes, Spain
Open Access

Abstract

We here describe a new ghost moth (Hepialidae) species, Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. from the Picos de Europa National Park, Cantabria, in northern Spain. The new species belongs to a group of mostly day-flying species that are restricted to the European Alps and some mountain ranges of southern Europe. Based on morphology and analysis of mitochondrial COI gene sequences, the new species is closely related to Pharmacis aemilianus (Constantini, 1911), an endemic of the Italian Apennines. However, Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. can easily be distinguished from all related species based on both external and genitalic characters. We briefly review and illustrate all species of the genus Pharmacis Hübner, 1820 and discuss its relationship with the related genus Korscheltellus Börner, 1920. We reinstate Hepialus castillanus Oberthür, 1883 as a distinct species and transfer it to Korscheltellus (stat. rev., comb. n.).

Resumen

Describimos una nueva especie de Hepialidae, Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. del Parque Nacional de Picos de Europa, Cantabria, España septentrional. La nueva especie pertenece a un grupo de especies de vuelo diurno cuya distribución se limita a los Alpes europeos y otras cadenas montañosas de Europa meridional. Según estudios morfológicos y análisis de secuencias del gen mitocondrial COI, la nueva especie es más próxima a Pharmacis aemilianus (Constantini, 1911), un endemismo de los Montes Apeninos en Italia. Sin embargo, Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. se distingue fácilmente de todas las especies relacionadas en sus caracteres externos y genitales. Evaluamos brevemente e ilustramos todas las especies del género Pharmacis Hübner, 1820 y comentamos su relación con el género emparentado Korscheltellus Börner, 1920. Restituimos Hepialus castillanus Oberthür, 1883 como especie y la trasladamos a Korscheltellus (stat. rev., comb. n.).

Introduction

The ghost moths (Hepialidae) constitute a family of evolutionarily primitive moths that occur worldwide with >500 species (Nielsen et al. 2000). The family is most species rich in Australia and South America, while in Europe only 15 species are currently known to occur (de Freina and Witt 1990; Leraut 2006). The larvae of most species are borers in or among the roots of woody or herbaceous plants. However, the larvae of some genera outside Europe tunnel in the trunks or branches of shrubs and trees.

In 2007, the second author photographed a mating pair of Hepialidae in the Picos de Europa Mountains in northern Spain that was initially considered to belong to Korscheltellus fusconebulosa (De Geer, 1778) (Fig. 1). However, closer inspection showed that the specimens did not conform to this species and suggested that they may represent a species of the genus Pharmacis Hübner, 1820 (type species Bombyx carna [Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775). The only Pharmacis species currently known from Spain, P. pyrenaicus (Donzel, 1838), shows substantial differences in wing pattern and size. Furthermore, P. pyrenaicus is limited to alpine habitats in the Pyrenees, usually at altitudes above 2000 m, while the mating pair in the Picos de Europa was found in open oak forest at a much lower altitude of about 800 m (Fig. 2). During subsequent visits to the locality, the authors, with the help of their colleagues Yeray Monasterio León and Ruth Escobés Jiménez, collected a series of males and a female, and confirmed that the specimens belonged to a previously undescribed species of the genus Pharmacis. Two further females were located later in the collection of Félix Javier González Estébanez. These had been collected in a different part of the Picos de Europa National Park, in the province of Asturias (Fig. 3). Finally, images of a mating pair and several males were found on Biodiversidadvirtual (2018), suggesting a wider distribution of this species in Cantabria and Asturia or perhaps larger parts of north-western Spain.

In order to place the new species, we review all species of the genus Pharmacis and the related genus Korscheltellus Börner, 1920, and use morphological and molecular evidence to support species delineation. The results of these studies and the description of the new species, Pharmacis cantabricus Kallies & Farino, sp. n., are presented here.

Figures 1–3. 

1. P. cantabricus sp. n., mating pair, Spain, Cantabria, Picos de Europa, Sierra Bejes. 2. Type locality of P. cantabricus sp. n. at the Sierra Bejes at about 800 m altitude. 3. Habitat of P. cantabricus sp. n. above the Lagos de Covadonga, at about 1375 m altitude. Image 3, F. González.

Composition of the genus Pharmacis

The genus Pharmacis comprises a small group of medium-sized Palaearctic ghost moths. Nielsen et al. (2000) listed eight species in the genus. However, two species were excluded subsequently. Viette (1949) transferred Phalaena fusconebulosa De Geer, 1778 to Korscheltellus, a view supported by several subsequent authors, including Wagner (1988) and Grehan (2012). This assessment was based on the morphology of a sclerotized ventral extension linked to the pseudotegumen and the fultura superior of the male genitalia. In the past, different authors have interpreted this structure as trulleum (Zilli, 1988) or mesosome (Wagner 1988; Grehan 2012). In agreement with Mielke and Grehan (personal communication), we here interpret it as the ventral extension of the pseudotegumen. It is spatulate and well sclerotized in all three species currently assigned to Korscheltellus, including the Palaearctic K. fusconebulosa and K. lupulina (Linnaeus, 1758) and the North American K. gracilis (Grote, 1865). In contrast, it is less sclerotized, distinctly three-dimensional and bears multiple fine ridges in Pharmacis. Leraut (2006) placed Hepialus castillanus Oberthür, 1883, an enigmatic taxon from Spain, previously assigned to Pharmacis by de Freina and Witt (1990) and Nielsen et al. (2000), as a subspecies of K. fusconebulosa. However, Leraut did not provide any detailed justification for his assessment. Based on the description and figures of genitalia provided by Agenjo (1942) and our own assessment of a specimen from the type locality, we support the notion that H. castillanus is related to K. fusconebulosa but conclude that it constitutes a valid species, Korscheltellus castillanus (Oberthür, 1883) stat. rev., comb. n. Furthermore, Leraut (2006) transferred Hepialus nebulosus Alphéraky, 1889 from Tibet, to Pharmacis. Subsequently, however, this taxon was placed in Parahepialus Zou & Zhang, 2010 (Zou et al. 2010), now considered a synonym of Thitarodes Viette, 1968 (Jiang et al. 2016). Finally, the status of the taxon Hepialus uralensis Grum-Grshimailo, 1899, for a long time considered a synonym of Pharmacis carna, has recently been clarified. It was reinstated as a bona fide species, Gazoryctra uralensis (Grum-Grshimailo, 1899) (= Hepialus fuscoargenteus Bang-Haas, 1927), by Anikin and Zolotuhin (2017). Thus, at present Pharmacis comprises six valid species, which occur exclusively in the Western Palaearctic, while the genus Korscheltellus contains four species with a wide Palaearctic and Nearctic range.

Checklist

The considerable list of synonyms and intrasubspecific names linked to some of these taxa can be found in Nielsen et al. (2000).

Pharmacis Hübner, 1820

P. carna ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775)

P. claudiae Kristal & Hirneisen, 1994

P. anselminae (Teobaldelli, 1977)

P. bertrandi (Le Cerf, 1936)

P. pyrenaicus pyrenaicus (Donzel, 1838)

P. pyrenaicus alticola (Oberthür, 1881)

P. aemilianus (Constantini, 1911)

P. cantabricus sp. n.

Korscheltellus Börner, 1920

K. fusconebulosa (De Geer, 1778)

K. castillanus (Oberthür, 1883), stat. rev., comb. n.

K. gracilis (Grote, [1865])

K. lupulina (Linnaeus, 1758)

Methods

COI sequences were downloaded from BOLD (http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/) or generated using the methodology described in detail by Milla et al. (2017). COI sequence alignments were created using the MAFFT v7.3.09 (Katoh and Standley 2013) plugin within Geneious R11.02 (Biomatters Ltd.) using the default Auto option. For the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis, we used the nucleotide substitution model GTR + I + G for RAxML (Stamatakis 2014) and 500 bootstraps. Pairwise sequence differences were calculated using Geneious. Genitalia were examined using standard methods and embedded in Euparal. For detailed examination of the labial palps, they were removed from the head, cleared in ethanol and embedded in Euparal. Antennal segments were counted under the microscope without including the scape. Images are by the authors unless specified differently.

Results of molecular analysis

In order to place the new species confidently within the genus Pharmacis and to test whether currently recognized species in the genus were supported by molecular data, we utilized mitochondrial COI DNA barcodes. Analysis of the COI sequences revealed that all species analysed in this study formed well separated monophyletic entities, supporting the notion that they are valid taxa (Fig. 4). Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. was resolved as a sister species to P. aemilianus, and the pair formed a sister clade to the rest of the Pharmacis species with the exception of P. pyrenaicus. Pharmacis claudiae was placed as a sister to a clade consisting of P. carna, P. anselminae and P. bertrandi, the latter two being sister species. Within the genus, the pairwise sequence difference was between 2% and 2.7% for sister species (P. cantabricus sp. n. vs P. aemilianus, and P. anselminae vs P. bertrandi) and 4.6% for more distantly related species (P. cantabricus sp. n. vs P. carna). Notably, P. pyrenaicus grouped together with species of Korscheltellus. However, although P. pyrenaicus is very distinct from the other Pharmacis species, both with regards to genitalia and antennal structures, there is little if any morphological evidence to support a close association with Korscheltellus. Overall, while our data support all taxa as valid species, more extensive molecular and morphological analyses are required to resolve the systematic position of P. pyrenaicus and the phylogeny of the genera Pharmacis and Korscheltellus.

Figure 4. 

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree inferred from COI sequences for the genera Pharmacis and Korscheltellus, with the outgroup Hepialus humuli. Branch lengths are proportional to ML estimated branch lengths.Values above the branches are percentage of ML bootstrap supports.

Distribution, behaviour and biology of Pharmacis

Species of the genus Pharmacis occur in the mountains of central, southern and south-western Europe, with one species, P. carna, also occurring in Fennoscandia. Some of the species show an extremely limited distribution, including P. bertrandi, P. anselminae and P. claudiae, which occur exclusively in small, high-altitude areas in the French and Italian Alps. Although both P. pyrenaicus and P. aemilianus have larger ranges, they too are restricted to relatively small regions covering the Pyrenees and Abruzzi, respectively. Notably, several of the Pharmacis species, including P. anselminae, P. bertrandi and P. pyrenaicus, have brachypterous females, probably an adaptation to the harsh conditions of the alpine environment in which they occur. Two of these species, P. anselminae and P. pyrenaicus, appear to be strictly day-flying, a feature shared by many moths that occur in alpine environments or high latitudes. The third species with brachypterous females, P. bertrandi, was found to be active in the second half of the night and in the morning. In contrast, P. claudiae and P. aemilianus have fully winged females and fly during the night time. Pharmacis carna on the other hand occurs from the foothills to the alpine regions of the Alps and other mountain ranges. It has been observed at night in some areas, whereas it was found to be active predominantly during the day in other areas (Daniel 1950; Wenta, personal communication). Thus, Pharmacis species associated with the higher mountain ranges of Europe show distinct morphological and behavioural adaptations to their environment. The larvae of Pharmacis species are underground feeders that appear to utilize the roots of a broad range of grasses and herbaceous plants (de Freina and Witt 1990; Buser et al. 2000; Leraut 2006).

Abbreviations. MfN – Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany; IBEB – Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, Barcelona, Spain; ZSM – Zoologische Staassammlung, München, Germany; CAK – collection A. Kallies, Australia; CAM – collection Anton Mayr, Austria; CEF – collection Egbert Friedrich, Germany; CFG – collection Félix Javier González Estébanez, Spain.

Taxonomy

Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n.

Figs 1, 5–8, 29–31, 32, 39, 41, 46

Type material

Holotype (Fig. 5): 1 ♂, N Spain, Cantabria, Picos de Europa National Park, Sierra de Bejes, ca 800 m, 43.247N, 4.651W, 9. July 2016, day flying, leg. A. Kallies & T. Farino (CAK, in MfN). Paratypes: 2 ♂, same data as holotype (genitalia prep. AK790, Figs 6, 39, 46); 7 ♂, 1 ♀, same locality, 18. July 2017, day flying, leg. Y. Monasterio, T. Farino & R. Escobés (CAK, specimens will be lodged in MfN, ZSM and IBEB, Figs 7, 2932); 2 ♀, N Spain, Asturias, Picos de Europa National Park, Lagos de Covadonga, ca 1375 m, 43°14’37.10”N, 4°59’44.23”W, 20. July 2007, during the day, leg. F. J. G. Estébanez (CFG, genitalia prep. AK861, Figs 8, 41).

Description

Male (Figs 5, 6, 29, 30, 39, 46). Alar expanse 29–33 mm, forewing length 13–15.5 mm. Head and thorax ochre-brown to greyish, covered with soft and relatively long, hair-like scales. Scales between eye and antenna present. Antenna consisting of 30–31 segments that are short, wide and relatively flat, resulting in an overall flattened (lamellate) antenna morphology. Labial palps well-developed, protruding well beyond the frons; three-segmented, with the three palpomeres well separated, the middle palpomere about twice as long as the apical one, the apical palpomere globular; dorsally with short scales, ventrally with long, hair-like scales. Forewings dark brown, along the costa and the area of the radius suffused with light ochre-brown; with an ill-defined whitish streak close to base; with an irregular white patch anterior of vein A; with another white patch between veins A and CuA2 near the anal angle, sometimes extending to the area between CuA1 and CuA2; with a few very small, ill-defined white patches postmedially; with a small white spot in the area of the cell at the stem of M2 and another small white spot at the basal fork of M1; all white markings embedded into light brown areas. Hindwing uniformly dark brown. Fringes of both fore and hindwing short and uniformly dark. Fore tibia with a distinct epiphysis, which consists of an open tube-like structure, ending in a short and wide tooth. Abdomen dorsally ochre to grey, ventrally light ochre, posterior margins of tergites light ochre. Abdominal sclerites (Fig. 46) poorly sclerotized, tergites 7 and 8 simple, sternite 7 laterally with a membranous spot on each side; sternite 8 roughly triangular and relatively long.

Female (Figs 7, 8, 31). Alar expanses 30–35 mm, forewing length 15–17.5 mm. Similar to male, but wings narrower, with 26–29 antennal segments, the extent of the white forewing markings variable. The white forewing markings of the female paratype from the type locality are extensive and similar to the markings of the males from the same location. However, the female photographed at the same location (Fig. 1, right specimen) has reduced white marks. One female from the Lagos de Covadonga lacks any distinct white markings (Fig. 8).

Male genitalia (Fig. 39). Vinculum with long processes (vincular condyles sensu Grehan 2012) at posterior margin; saccus rounded; the paired apical processes of the pseudotegumen long, each with a small protrusion at the distal margin, not fused; ventral extension of the pseudotegumen (trulleum sensu Zilli 1988 and Simonsen 2018; spatulate mesosome sensu Wagner 1988 and Grehan 2012) large and well sclerotized; valva relatively straight, long and narrow, without sub-basal tooth at the ventral margin.

Female genitalia (Fig. 41). Papillae anales narrow and setose; lamella antevaginalis shortly setose, with two submedial invaginations forming ventricle-like structures; each a very small sclerotized plate on either side of the ostium; corpus bursae ovoid, membranous; ductus bursae long and simple.

Figures 5–12. 

Pharmacis species. 5–8. P. cantabricus sp. n., Spain, Picos de Europa. 5. Male, holotype, alar expanse 33 mm (MfN). 6. Male, paratype, alar expanse 30 mm. (CAK). 7. Female, paratype, alar expanse 31 mm (CAK). 8. Female, paratype, alar expanse 35 mm (CFG). 9–10. P. aemilianus, Italy, Abbruzi, Pescocostanzo. 9. Male, alar expanse 34 mm (MfN). 10. Female, alar expanse 52 mm (MfN). 11. P. pyrenaicus pyrenaicus, male, France, Pyrenees, alar expanse 25 mm (CAK). 12. P. pyrenaicus alticola, male, Pyrenees, alar expanse, 27.5 mm (MfN).

Variability

Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. shows considerable variability in the extent of the white markings on the forewing. Specifically, the spots between A and CuA2 can be reduced or confluent, the white streak in the base of the forewing can be more or less extensive. Similarly, the extent of the light brown areas of the forewing varies. The female of a mating pair figured on Biodiversidadvirtual (2018, as Pharmacis sp.) has dark grey instead of brown forewings. The corresponding male is ochre-brown, and both specimens have the white mark reduced to the discal spot. In some females the white marks can be absent altogether (Fig. 8).

Diagnosis

Males of P. cantabricus sp. n. can be differentiated from males of all other species by the white forewing markings, which are usually reduced to an often ill-defined white streak near the base, an irregular white patch just anterior of vein A, and a third white patch between veins A and CuA2 near the anal angle. The extent of these white markings is, however, variable. In some specimens they are further reduced or even absent (as in the female in Fig. 8), in others they form an almost continuous white line (as in female in Fig. 7). Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. differs from most other species of Pharmacis, with the exception of P. aemilianus, by the well-developed labial palps. Although the labial palps of all Pharmacis species consist of three segments, they markedly differ in their structure. In P. cantabricus sp. n. all segments are well-separated, and while the middle palpomere is very long, the apical palpomere is very short and distinctly bulbous. In all other species, with the exception of P. aemilianus, the labial palps are much shorter, and the palpomeres are of similar length, with the apical one pointed and partially fused to the middle segment. Furthermore, in P. cantabricus sp. n. and P. aemilianus, the labial palps are covered with short scales dorsally and long and thin scales ventrally, while they are clothed in long hair-like scales dorsally and ventrally in all other species. Diagnostic characters can also be found in the abdominal sclerites, which are poorly sclerotized in P. cantabricus sp. n. (Fig. 46) and P. aemilianus (not shown), while they are well sclerotized in the other species examined, P. anselminae (Fig. 47) and P. pyrenaicus (Fig. 48). Sternite 7 is relatively wide in P. cantabricus sp. n. and P. aemilianus while it is narrow in the distal half in other species examined (P. pyrenaicus and P. anselminae). Sternite 8 is roughly triangular and relatively long in P. cantabricus sp. n. and P. aemilianus, while it is quadrangular and short in P. anselminae (Fig. 47) and very wide and short in P. pyrenaicus (Fig. 48).

Based on DNA barcoding, morphology of the genitalia and labial palps and the number of antennal segments, the new species appears to be closely related to P. aemilianus (Figs 9, 10) from Italy. Both species have about 29–30 antennal segments, well-developed labial palps and a well-developed ventral extension of the pseudotegumen of the male genitalia. However, these two species can be easily separated by external characteristics such as wing coloration (yellow-brown to ochre-brown in P. aemilianus; dark brown with light brown markings in P. cantabricus sp. n.), white forewing markings (typically reduced and often with just a white mark prominent in the cell in P. aemilianus; typically with larger white markings along the posterior section of the forewing in P. cantabricus sp. n.), the size (substantially larger, alar expanse in males 30–36 mm and in females 36–52 mm in P. aemilianus), and wing shape (in P. aemilianus the forewings longer and narrower in males, broader in females). The genitalia of both species are very similar. Males of both species display a well-developed ventral extension of the pseudotegumen and large vincular condyles. Similarly, the ventricle-like invaginations in the lamella antevaginalis of the female genitalia is present in both species. However, P. cantabricus sp. n. differs from P. aemilianus in a number of details: the apical part of the valva is shorter and narrower in P. cantabricus sp. n. (longer and expanded in P. aemilianus), the paired ventral processes of the pseudotegumen are longer, and the apical margins of pseudotegumen have a small protrusion (absent in P. aemilianus), the saccus is more rounded (tapering to a point in P. aemilianus) and the processes of the vinculum are tapering and bent outwards (wider and bent inwards in P. aemilianus). Furthermore, both species differ in their behaviour, with P. aemilianus being active at dusk and during the night, whereas P. cantabricus sp. n. appears to be strictly day-flying. Finally, females of P. aemilianus are able to fly freely, which does not appear to be the case for female P. cantabricus sp. n.

Pharmacis pyrenaicus (Figs 11, 12, 35) can easily distinguished by the light yellow to white fringe of the hindwings (uniformly dark in P. cantabricus sp. n.) and the usually much more extensive white markings of the forewings. Furthermore, the males of both species differ in their antennae, which are not flattened, appear somewhat serrate and have only 22–23 segments in P. pyrenaicus. Both species also differ profoundly in their male genitalia. The ventral extension of the pseudotegumen and projections at the posterior margin of the vinculum are absent, the valva is short and arched, and the saccus is square in appearance in P. pyrenaicus. Finally, the female of P. pyrenaicus (Fig. 35) is brachypterous, while the female of P. cantabricus sp. n. is fully winged. Pharmacis bertrandi (Figs 13, 26) has very regular and extensive white forewing markings, usually also in the termen and close to the costa, markedly embedded into reddish brown areas (reduced white markings, absent in the termen and costal area in P. cantabricus sp. n.). Males have 34–35 antennal segments. Females of P. bertrandi are brachypterous. Pharmacis carna (Figs 14–16, 27, 33) has more extensive yellow to white forewing markings; the hindwing fringe is mixed yellow and dark brown (dark brown throughout in P. cantabricus sp. n.). Males have 25–27 antennal segments (Buser et al. 2000 and our observations). Females of P. carna are fully winged and able to fly. Pharmacis anselminae (Figs 17, 25, 34) differs substantially by the light markings on its forewing, which are not distinctly edged or embedded into light brown scales, and by the presence of a dirty yellow patch subapically at the forewing costa. Males have 25–27 antennal segments (Buser et al. 2000). Females of P. anselminae are brachypterous. Pharmacis claudiae (Fig. 18) has extensive and evenly distributed white markings on the forewings (reduced in P. cantabricus sp. n.) and the hindwing fringe is white, somewhat mixed with dark brown at the veins. Males have 26–28 antennal segments (Buser et al. 2000). Females of P. claudiae are fully winged and able to fly.

Finally, P. cantabricus sp. n. differs from all species of Korscheltellus in the shape of ventral extension of the pseudotegumen (spatulate and simple in Korscheltellus, three-dimensional and furrowed in P. cantabricus sp. n.) and the forewing pattern. From both K. fusconebulosa and K. castillanus stat. rev., comb. n. the new species also differs by the monochrome brown fringes of fore and hindwings (chequered in the two species compared).

Figures 13–18. 

Pharmacis species. 13. P. bertrandi, male, Italy, Cuneo, alar expanse 38 mm (CAM). 14–16. P. carna. 14. Male, Austria, Oberösterreich, alar expanse 33 mm (CEF). 15. Male, Austria, Steiermark, alar expanse 35 mm (CEF). 16. Female, Italy, Lombardia, alar expanse 40 mm (CAK). 17. P. anselminae, male, Italy, Valle de Aosta, alar expanse 33 mm (CAK). 18. P. claudiae, male, Valle de Aosta, alar expanse 41 mm (CAK). Images 13, H. Deutsch; 14–15, E. Friedrich.

Habitat and biology

Pharmacis cantabricus sp. n. inhabits open grassy woodlands and rich meadows and pastures in montane and subalpine parts of the Picos de Europa. In the Sierra de Bejes, the authors found P. cantabricus in open Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. woodland with Corylus avellana L. on a north-west-facing ridge of Carboniferous limestone at about 800 m altitude (Fig. 2). The ground layer is dominated by Brachypodium P. Beauv. species, with accompanying Aquilegia vulgaris L., Geranium sanguineum L., Astrantia major L. and Thalictrum minus L. Here, P. cantabricus sp. n. shares its habitat with Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763) (Nymphalidae) and Carterocephalus palaemon (Pallas, 1771) (Hesperiidae), two butterfly species with a very restricted distribution in Spain.

The second known locality is considerably different. It is situated above the Lagos de Covadonga at about 1375 m (Fig. 3). Here the specimens were found in open pastures interspersed with limestone outcrops, used for cattle grazing (Estébanez, personal communication). Another mating pair was photographed by Antonio Rodriguez at low altitude (<200 m) west of the Picos de Europe on the 30th of July 2016 (Biodiversidadvirtual, 2018; as ‘Pharmacis sp.’). Finally, specimens that may belong to P. cantabricus sp. n. were observed by Marcos Toribio in Robledo de Anayo (Asturia) at about 550 m altitude (Biodiversidadvirtual, 2018; as ‘Pharmacis lupulina’). These specimens were attracted to lights over several days in early September 2014 (Toribio, personal communication). However, there were no specimens available to conclusively test their identity. Thus, while confirmed records suggest that P. cantabricus sp. n. is limited to the Picos de Europa and flies only during the day in July, additional unconfirmed records suggest that it may fly well into September and may also be active at night.

Males of P. cantabricus sp. n. were seen flying rapidly over the vegetation between the late morning and afternoon. Mating was observed in the afternoon. Detailed observations were made in the Sierra de Bejes on the 18 July 2017. On arrival at the site at 12.45 pm, the weather was sunny, 24 °C, with light winds. The cloud cover was 40–50% initially, but increased to about 90% by 4.40 pm, with only a few sporadic sunny intervals later. A total of 7 males were caught between 1.35 and 5.05 pm. One male was caught at 3.00 pm, when it was attracted to a female hanging in grasses by the side of the track (Fig. 31), although it made no attempt to copulate. The female was then placed in a cage. Her abdomen, although bulky, was not extended much below the wings in resting posture at this point. At 5.00 pm, two males were placed in the cage with the female. Shortly after this, copulation took place, which lasted less than 35 minutes (Fig. 32). During mating, the abdomen of the female became much more extended (compare Fig. 1). By approximately 6.30 pm the female had laid a copious quantity of eggs and her abdomen had shrunk considerably. On one occasion, on the 9 July 2016, on the same day when multiple males were observed flying during day time, light trapping was undertaken at the type locality. However, no specimens were attracted to the light, suggesting that the main period of activity is during the day. This notion is also supported by the observation that mating occurred in the afternoon.

Distribution

The new species is currently known only from a small area that includes the Picos de Europe and the surrounding area in the provinces of Asturia and Cantabria in north-western Spain.

Figures 19–24. 

Korscheltellus species. 19–21. K. fusconebulosa. 19. Male, Italy, Vintschgau, alar expanse 36 mm (CEF). 20. Male, Germany, Schmalkalden (CEF). 21. Female, Germany, Schmalkalden (CEF). 22. K. castillanus, female, alar expanse 32 mm (MfN). 23–24. K. lupulina. 23. Male, Germany, alar expanse 27 mm (CEF). 24. Female, Austria, Steiermark, alar expanse 33 mm (CAK). Images 19–21, 23, E. Friedrich.

Discussion

The highly restricted distribution of most of the Pharmacis species is probably a result of frequent glaciation events during the Pleistocene or earlier ice ages. During these periods, Pharmacis populations may have withdrawn into isolated refugia in the mountains of southern Europe and undergone speciation. Such a scenario is exemplified by the distribution of the three species of the P. carna species group (P. anselminae, P. bertrandi and P. claudiae), each of which is represented by small isolated populations in the French and Italian Alps. The hypothesis of glaciation-driven speciation in Pharmacis may be supported by the relatively low pairwise sequence differences between closely related species (2–2.7%) observed here. Based on the estimated 1.0–2.3% per million years (Mya) average substitution rate for COI (Kandul et al. 2004; Wilke et al., 2009), these values suggest that Pharmacis diversification was initiated during the early pleistocene glaciation periods, which commenced about 2.58 Mya. The initial split between the clade containing P. aemilianus and P. cantabricus sp. n. and the rest of Pharmacis is likely to have occurred much earlier given the pairwise difference of 4.6% between P. cantabricus sp. n. and P. carna. However, estimates of the age of speciation events based on COI sequence differences are controversial as the rate of evolution of COI is thought to be taxon dependent (Pentinsaari et al. 2016).

The new species, P. cantabricus sp. n., is currently known only from within and around the Picos de Europa, a small mountain range at the convergence of the provinces of Asturias, Cantabria and León in northern Spain. In contrast to the high alpine environment inhabited by other highly localized Pharmacis species, P. cantabricus sp. n. was found in open oak (Quercus) woodland in the montane zone and in subalpine pastures. However, additional observations suggest that it also occurs at much lower altitude, and it remains to be seen how widely P. cantabricus sp. n. is distributed in northern and north-western Spain. Pharmacis aemilianus, the closest relative of the new species, occurs in Italy in a range of different habitats ranging from about 200 to 2000 m altitude (Lepiforum 2018; Leraut 2006). The extant ranges of P. cantabricus sp. n. and P. aemilianus may reflect the survival of isolated Pharmacis populations in the Iberian and Italian refugia, respectively. It appears that the Franco-Cantabric region may have been a particularly important refugium for Pharmacis, as two species, P. cantabricus sp. n. and P. pyrenaicus are found only here. Korscheltellus castillanus is likely to represent another survivor linked to the Iberian refugium. Notably, alpine refugia have been recently proposed for genetically heterogenous populations of Hepialus humuli (Linnaeus, 1758). However, the well-developed dispersal ability of this species appears to have prevented further diversification (Simonsen and Huemer 2014).

The restricted distribution of several of the Pharmacis species is likely to be supported by the limited potential for dispersal owing to the brachyptery of the females. Interestingly, it appears that brachyptery in Pharmacis females has arisen at least twice independently, as it can be found in the P. carna group, specifically in the sister species P. anselminae and P. bertrandi, and in P. pyrenaicus, which according to our molecular analyses belong to different clades within the genus. Although female P. cantabricus sp. n. have well-developed wings, they are short in comparison to the abdomen (Fig. 1), suggesting that they are unable to fly before they have laid the majority of their eggs. Thus, it appears that, similar to hepialid genera in other parts of the world (Dugdale 1994; Edwards and Green 2011), brachyptery is part of the ground plan of Pharmacis. It is indeed tempting to speculate that additional isolated Pharmacis species might be found in the mountains of southern Europe, particularly in the northern Balkans.

We have here followed the generic division of Pharmacis and Korscheltellus proposed by Viette (1949), Wagner (1988) and Grehan (2012). However, the morphological and genetic evidence for the separation of Korscheltellus and Pharmacis should be revisited. The spatulate shape of the elongated ventral extension of the pseudotegumen (trulleum sensu Zilli 1988 and Simonsen 2018) or mesosome (sensu Wagner 1988 and Grehan 2012) is considered a synapomorphy of Korscheltellus. While the size and shape of the ventral extension of the pseudotegumen in Korscheltellus and Pharmacis species is indeed different (Figs 39, 40, 44), it is notably reduced or possibly absent in P. pyrenaicus (Figs 42, 43), a species that our COI sequence analysis (Fig. 4) places within Korscheltellus. Therefore, more extensive DNA sequence and morphological analyses are required to resolve the phylogeny of the species currently placed in Korscheltellus and Pharmacis.

Finally, the generic placement of some species from Central Asia and the Eastern Palaearctic that are currently assigned to the genus Thitarodes should be reassessed as they show similarities to Korscheltellus. This includes T. nebulosus (Alphéraky, 1889), a species considered to be closely related to K. fusconebulosa by Leraut (2006). Thus, it remains to be determined whether Pharmacis indeed contains only the current group of European taxa or should be expanded to contain Korscheltellus and perhaps additional Eastern Palaearctic hepialid taxa.

Notably, de Freina and Witt (1990) have questioned the validity of several taxa, including P. anselminae, P. bertrandi and K. castillanus, and suggested that they are solely representatives of isolated populations of P. pyrenaicus. Based on both genitalia morphology and COI analysis, this is surely not the case. Pharmacis anselminae and P. bertrandi are sister species and belong to the P. carna group of species, while P. pyrenaicus occupies an isolated position in comparison to the other species of Pharmacis. Although K. castillanus could not be studied in detail in our analysis due to the paucity of available material, it is clear that, based on external appearance and genitalia morphology (Agenjo 1942), it is not closely related to Pharmacis but shows affinities to species combined in Korscheltellus.

The hepialid fauna of Spain was last reviewed by Agenjo (1942) who illustrated the male and female genitalia of all taxa. He listed H. humuli, P. pyrenaicus, K. fusconebulosa, K. castillanus, K. lupulina and Triodia sylvina (Linnaeus, 1761), and subsequent studies did not add any new species to this list (Garcia et al. 1983; de Freina and Witt 1990). Thus, with the addition of P. cantabricus sp. n., the hepialid fauna of Spain now comprises seven species. Only two species appear to be known from Portugal, K. lupulina and T. sylvina (Corley, personal communication).

Figures 25–31. 

Live Pharmacis specimens. 25. P. anselminae, male, Italy, Valle de Aosta. 26. P. bertrandi, male, France, Haute Alps. 27. P. carna, male, Poland, Tatra Mts,. 28. P. aemilianus, male, Italy, Central Apennines. 29–31. P. cantabricus sp. n., males (29, 30), female (31), Spain, Picos de Europa. Images 25, R. Bryner; 26, A. Longieras; 27, J. Wenta; 28, P. Mazzei.

Notes on the species of Pharmacis and Korscheltellus

P. aemilianus (Constantini, 1911)

Figs 9, 10, 28, 40

This species is an Italian endemic, which occurs in most parts of the mainland, ranging from about 200 to 2000 m altitude (Leraut 2006; Lepiforum 2018). It was redescribed and the male genitalia were illustrated by Zilli (1988). Its flight period ranges from July to September, but most records appear to be from August (Leraut 2006; Lepiforum 2018; Mazzei et al. 2018). According to Mazzei (personal communication), in the Central Apennines the species occurs in open forest with Quercus and Fagus above 1000 m. It is attracted to light quite commonly around dusk. The males fly quickly for about half an hour, then they disappear. It has not been seen to be active during the day. Additional detailed information can be found in Bertaccini et al. (1997). Images of live males and females were published by Mazzei et al. (2018) and Lepiforum (2018).

Material examined. 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Italy, Abbruzi, Pescocostanzo (MfN, genitalia prep AK864, Figs 9, 10, 40); 1 ♂, Italy, Vado di Pezza, Rovere (L’Aquila), 23.vii.2016, image Paolo Mazzei (Fig. 28).

P. pyrenaicus (Donzel, 1838)

Figs 11, 12, 35, 42, 43, 48

This species is endemic to the Pyrenees (Spain, France and Andorra), where it occurs at altitudes between 1800 and 2800 m (Garcia et al. 1983; de Freina 1990; Leraut 2006; Lépi’Net 2018). Leraut (2006) proposed that the taxon alticola Oberthür, 1881 should be considered a distinct subspecies of P. pyrenaicus. Male and female genitalia were illustrated by Agenjo (1942), male genitalia also by Viette (1948) and Leraut (2006). The mating behaviour and oviposition was described in detail by Bethune-Baker (1913). Images of males and females can be found on Lépi’Net (2018) and Biodiversidadvirtual (2018, as Pharmacis sp.).

Material examined. P. pyrenaicus pyrenaicus: 1 ♂, France S, Pyrenees-O., Fort Rome NW, Col de Puymorens, 2000–2500 m, 13.vii.2003, leg. Andree Salk (CAK, genitalia prep. AK820, DNA AK350, Figs 11, 42, 48); 1 ♀, Spain, Huesca, Pico Turbón, 2000 m, 15.vii.2015, image Enrique Murria Beltrán (Fig. 35); 1 ♂, France, Pyr. Or., Casteil Pla Guillem, 2400 m, 2.vii.1998, 15 h, leg. Peslier (CAM); 1 ♂, France, Gourette, 2300 m, 26.vii.1994 (CAM). P. pyrenaicus alticola: 1 ♂, Pyren[nees]. Stgr. / genitalia prep. AK860 (MfN, genitalia prep. AK860, Figs 12, 43).

Figures 32–35. 

Live Pharmacis specimens. 32. P. cantabricus sp. n., mating pair, Spain, Picos de Europa. 33. P. carna, mating pair, Poland, Tatra Mts. 34. P. anselminae, mating pair, Italy, Valle de Aosta. 35. P. pyrenaicus, female, Spain, Pyrenees. Images 33, J. Wenta; 34, R. Bryner; 35, E. Beltrán.

P. bertrandi (Le Cerf, 1936)

Figs 13, 26

This species was described from the French Alps (Le Cerf 1936), where it has also been found more recently (Longieras 2013). It occurs at altitudes between 1800–2500 m (Leraut 2006). It was unknown in Italy (Bertaccini et al. 1997) but was recently discovered at high altitudes in the north-west of the country (Gianti and Delmastro 2006). According to Gianti and Delmastro (2006) and Longieras (2013) males fly rapidly early in the morning between 7.30 and 9.00 am. However, the species has only rarely been collected during the day. Recently, a large number of males was observed at Gias Valcavera (Prov. Cuneo) in Italy at about 2050 m altitude (Mayr, personal communication). The specimens were attracted to light traps between 2 am and dawn. The habitat was a mosaic of alpine pastures and scree slopes, and specimens were seen between the 17 and 27 July. In the same locality only one male was seen flying in the morning. Thus, it is possible that P. bertrandi flies mainly during the second half of the night and that diurnal activity is the exception. Alternatively, the flight time may depend on local conditions. The female of P. bertrandi is brachypterous and has only rarely been collected; one is illustrated on Lepiforum (2018). The male genitalia were illustrated by Viette (1948), Teobaldelli (1977), Gianti and Delmastro (2006) and Leraut (2006). The validity of this taxon was doubted by de Freina and Witt (1990); however, based on both morphology and barcoding results, we consider P. bertrandi a valid species.

Material examined. 15 ♂, Italy, Prov. Cuneo, Gias Valcavera, 2050 m, 44°22.6’N, 07°08.2’E, 23. and 27.vii.2009, 17.vii.2012, 22.vii.2013, leg. A. Mayr (CAM, CAK, Fig. 13); 1 ♀, Valle Grana, 2400 m, 15.vii.2013, leg. L. Bertoncino (CAM).

P. carna ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775)

Figs 14–16, 27, 33

This species is distributed throughout the higher central European mountains, including the Alps and Carpathian Mts., also in Fennoscandia. Records from the Ural Mts (de Freina and Witt 1990) appear to relate to Gazoryctra uralensis (Anikin and Zolotuhin 2017). Within its range P. carna seems to occur only locally. According to Buser et al. (2000), in Switzerland the species flies in rich meadows between 1200 and 1900 m. The same authors state that the males fly after midnight and are occasionally attracted to light. According to Daniel (1950), however, the main time of activity is during daylight hours. He observed them in the German Alps at altitudes between 1150 and 2200 m, most specimens between 1700–2000 m, from early in the morning to midday, in shaded places even into the afternoon. He also observed mating and oviposition during the day. This is consistent with observations by Wenta (personal communication), who in Poland frequently observed mating in the morning. However, he never saw the males flying, suggesting that at this locality they were active during the night or very early in the morning. A female was observed laying eggs in the Jaworzynka Valley, Tatra Mts, at an altitude of about 1400 m at 11 am (Wenta, personal communication). Thus, it is likely that local conditions determine the flight time of P. carna.

Material examined. 1 ♂, Austria, Oberösterreich, Weyer, Küpfern, train station, 400 m, 11.vii.1999, at light, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF, Fig. 14); 1 ♂, Austria, Steiermark, Alt-Aussee, Loser, 1600 m, 5.viii.1999, at light, leg. E. Meisinger, E. Friedrich (CEF, Fig. 15); 2 ♂, Slovenia, Julische Alpen, Bovec, Mangart, 1700 m, 27.vi.2003, at light, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF); 1 ♀, Italy, Lombardia, Passo di Croce Domini, Brescia N, Astrio E, 1700–2350 m, at day, 21.-23.vii.2009, leg. Andree Salk (CAK, Fig. 16).

Figures 36–38. 

Live Korscheltellus specimens, Spain. 36–38. K. lupulina, Palencia. 36. Male. 37. Female. 38. K. fusconebulosa, Picos de Europa.

P. anselminae (Teobaldelli, 1977)

Figs 17, 25, 34, 44, 47

This species is only known from the Aosta valley in NW Italy at altitudes between 1800 and 2500 m. It inhabits alpine meadows and pastures. Males fly rapidly in the sun, starting in the morning and continuing until late afternoon, with peak activity between 10 am and noon. They stop flying when the sun disappears behind clouds (Teobaldelli 1977; Kristal et al. 1994; Bertaccini et al. 1997; Buser et al. 2000; and observations by the first author). The male genitalia were illustrated by Leraut (2006), Kristal et al. (1994) and Teobaldelli (1977). Leraut (2006) erroneously reported that this species flies at night. The validity of this taxon was doubted by de Freina and Witt (1990); however, based on both morphology and barcoding results, we undoubtedly consider P. anselminae to be a valid species.

Material examined. 15 ♂, 2 ♀, Italy, Val d’Aosta, Val Valleile, Cogne, 1950 m, 11.vii.1990, leg. A. Kallies (CAK, genitalia prep. AK863, Figs 17, 44, 47).

P. claudiae Kristal & Hirneisen, 1994

Fig. 18

This species was described relatively recently from the Aosta Valley in north-western Italy (Kristal et al. 1994). It is related and similar to P. carna, but it differs in details of the wing markings, antennae, and genitalia (Kristal et al. 1994; Buser et al. 2000). The males fly for about two hours, starting just before midnight. The species occurs in alpine grasslands at altitudes of 1900–2600 m in the Valle d’Aosta in north-western Italy. The flight period is from mid-July to early August (Kristal et al. 1994; Buser et al. 2000). The fully winged female was described by Bertaccini et al. (1997). The male genitalia were illustrated by Kristal et al. (1994). Images of live adults were published by Mazzei et al. (2018) and Lepiforum (2018).

Material examined. 1 ♂, Italy, Val d’Aosta, Valtourrenche, A.-St. Andre, Torgnon, Alpi Clogne, 2100–2200m, 25.vii.1994, leg. P.M. Kristal & J. Roth (CAK, Fig. 18).

Figures 39–41. 

Pharmacis genitalia. 39. P. cantabricus sp. n., male, paratype. 40. P. aemilianus, male. 41. P. cantabricus sp. n., female, paratype. a – vincular condyles; b – ventral extension of the pseudotegumen; c – apical margin of pseudotegumen; d – ventral pseudoteguminal arm.

K. fusconebulosa (De Geer, 1778)

Figs 19–21, 38

This species is widespread and occurs from Western Europe to Japan (Leraut 2006). It is well recorded from the northern part of Spain (Garcia et al. 1983; Ylla and Masó 1990).

Material examined. 1 ♂, Germany, Schmalkalden, JH ‘Ebertswiese’, 730 m, at light, 30.vi.–2.vii.1989, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF, Fig. 20); 1 ♀, same locality, 16.vi.1993, at light, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF, Fig. 21); 1 ♂, Germany, Niesky, Niederspree, at light, 16.vi.1998, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF); 1 ♂, Germany, Mecklenburg, Umg. Schwerin, Lewitzwald, Friedrichsmoor, 20.vi.1990, at light, leg. A. Kallies (CAK); 1 ♀, Italy, Lombardia, Passo di Crocce Domini, Brescia N, Astrio E, 1700–2350 m, 21.–23.vii.2009, leg. A. Salk (CAK); 1 ♂, Italy, Vinschgau, N Laas, Allitz-Säge, 1400 m, at light, 3.vii.2006, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF, Fig. 19); 1 ♀, Germany, Oberweissbach, Meuraer Heide, 28.vi.1996, at light, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF); 1 ♂, Spain, Aran, Tredós, 23.vi.2018, leg. et coll. A. & Z. Laštůvka; 1 ♀, Spain, Cantabria, Fuenfría, 26.v.2006, image Teresa Farino; 1 ♂, Spain, Cantabria, Cantera de Vendejo, 26.v.2014, image Teresa Farino (Fig. 38).

K. castillanus (Oberthür, 1883), stat. rev., comb. n.

Fig. 22

This taxon is insufficiently known. It was treated as a member of the genus Pharmacis by de Freina and Witt (1990) and Nielsen et al. (2000). Later, Leraut (2006) examined the holotype and the male genitalia and considered castillanus a subspecies of K. fusconebulosa. A close relationship between castillanus and K. fusconebulosa is supported by the presence of a spatulate ventral projection of the pseudotegumen in the male genitalia, the autapomorphic character of Korscheltellus, and the similarity of the two taxa in forewing pattern. However, we do not see sufficient evidence for the notion that castillanus should be considered a subspecies of K. fusconebulosa. Thus, we here formally transfer castillanus to Korscheltellus and retain it as a valid species. In line with our view, Agenjo (1942), who illustrated the male and female genitalia of both taxa in considerable detail, treated both taxa as distinct species. Further work, in particular detailed morphological and molecular studies are required to clarify the status of K. castillanus.

Korscheltellus castillanus is similar to K. fusconebulosa but smaller and less vividly coloured, with the wingspan ranging from 27–28 mm in males to 32 mm in females (males 28–35 mm, females 35–46 mm in K. fusconebulosa). According to the figures provided by Agenjo (1942) the sub-basal costal tooth at the ventral edge of the valva is less developed in K. castillanus compared to K. fusconebulosa. Furthermore, the valva is narrower and the saccus much less extended in K. castillanus compared to K. fusconebulosa.

K. castillanus is known from only a small number of specimens that have been collected in a small area north-west of Madrid (La Granja de San Ildefonso, Balsain, El Escorial, in the Sierra de Guadarrama), and no new material has been found in the last 70 years. According to Agenjo (1942), K. castillanus flies between May and July.

Material examined. 1 ♀, [Spain] Sn Ildef [San Ildefonso], 84, m / 1/6 / ♀ [unreadable] Stgr. (MfN, Fig. 22).

K. gracilis (Grote, 1865)

This is a North American species, which has been discussed in detail elsewhere (Wagner 1988; Wagner and Rosovsky 1991; Grehan 2012). Previous morphological studies have suggested a close relationship with K. fusconebulosa (Wagner 1988; Grehan 2012), which is confirmed here based on our COI study.

K. lupulina (Linnaeus 1758)

Figs 23, 24, 36, 37, 45

This species is widespread in Europe and well recorded from the northern part of Spain (Garcia et al. 1983; Ylla and Masó 1990).

Material examined. 1 ♂, Spain, Leon, La Una, 15.vi.2013, leg. González Estébanez (CAK, genitalia prep. AK816, Fig. 45); 1 ♀, Spain, Palencia, Villaescusa de las Torres, 5.vi.2013, image Teresa Farino; 1 ♂, Spain, Palencia, Arroyo Lazán, 3.vi.2013, image Teresa Farino (Fig. 36, coll Marc Botham); 1 ♀, Spain, Palencia, Puerto de Piedrasluengas, 27.v.2015, image Teresa Farino (Fig. 37); 1 ♂, S France, Ardeche, Lagorce, Ibie valley, 11–17.ix.1993, leg. D. Forster (CAK, Gen. prep. AK817); 1 ♀, Austria, Steiermark, Gosdorf/Mur, 16.v.1993, during day, leg. D. Hamborg (CAK, Fig. 24); 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Germany, Thuringia, Jena, Neulobeda-West, 19–31.v.1989, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF, Fig. 23); 1 ♀, Germany, Thuringia, Jena, Kernberge, 7.v.1980, leg. E. Friedrich (CEF).

Figures 42–48. 

Pharmacis and Korscheltellus, male genitalia (42–45) and terminal abdominal sclerites (46–48). 42. P. pyrenaicus pyrenaicus (pseudotegumen flattened). 43. P. pyrenaicus alticola (pseudotegumen in natural position). 44. P. anselminae. 45. K. lupulina. 46. P. cantabricus sp. n. paratype (stained). 47. P. anselminae (unstained). 48. P. pyrenaicus pyrenaicus (unstained). Images 46–48, Q. Wang.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the large number of individuals who have contributed to this work. Only through their support was this study made possible in its current form. We thank John Grehan for alerting the first author to the images of P. cantabricus sp. n., and thereby initiating this study. We thank Yeray Monasterio León, Ruth Escobés Jiménez and Félix Javier González Estébanez for their invaluable help in observing and collecting type specimens of P. cantabricus sp. n. We thank Joël Minet, Vadim Zolotuhin, John Grehan, Axel Steiner, Thomas Witt and Josef de Freina for information regarding type material and for help collating relevant literature. We express our gratitude to Andree Salk and Tony Mayr for donating material used in this study. We thank Antoine Longieras, Mauro Gianti, Giovanni Delmastro and Tony Mayr for information concerning the distribution and habits of P. bertrandi, Antoine Longieras, Rudolf Bryner and Helmut Deutsch for permission to use their images, Enrique Murria Beltrán for images and specimens of P. pyrenaicus, Jarosłav Wenta for images and information relating to P. carna, Paolo Mazzei for images and information relating to P. aemilianus, Egbert Friedrich for images, and Yeray Monasterio León, Marcos Toribio, Colin W. Plant, Zdeněk Laštůvka, Martin F. V. Corley and Roger Vila for information concerning the distribution of Iberian Hepialidae. We are grateful to Axel Hausmann and Peter Huemer for providing sequences used in this study, and to Wolfram Mey for access to type material under his care. Furthermore, we wish to thank Tom McConville and Liz Milla for performing COI sequencing and analysis, and Qike Wang for his help with imaging. We would like to thank John Grehan, Thomas Simonsen and Carlos Mielke for helpful comments on the manuscript. Finally we would like to thank the Consejería de Medio Rural, Pesca y Alimentación del Gobierno de Cantabria and the Parque Nacional de Picos de Europa for providing us with the necessary licences to carry out the field work.

References

  • Anikin VV, Zolotuhin VV (2017) Types of Bombyces and Sphinges described from the Volgo-Ural Region. Proceedings of the Museum Witt Munich 7: 506–514, 644. [plate 52]
  • Bertaccini E, Fiumi G, Provera P (1997) Bombici e sfingi d’Italia (Lepidoptera Heterocera). Vol. 2. Natura, Guiliano Russo Editore, Menterenzio (BO), 256 pp.
  • Bethune-Baker GT (1913) The pairing habits of Hepialus pyrenaicus. The Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation 25(2): 52–53.
  • Buser H, Huber W, Renato J (2000) Hepialidae. In: Fotorotar AG (Ed.) Schmetterlinge und ihre Lebensräume (Vol. 3). Pro Natura – Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, Druck, Verlag, Neue Medien, 61–69.
  • de Freina JJ, Witt TJ (1990) Die Bombyces und Sphinges der Westpalaearktis. Vol. 2. Edition Forschung und Wissenschaft, München, 143 pp.
  • Dugdale JS (1994) Hepialidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 30. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, 136 pp.
  • Edwards ED, Green K (2011) Two new species of Oxycanus Walker (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) from Kosciuszko National Park, one with a sub-brachypterous female. Australian Journal of Entomology 50: 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2010.00790.x
  • Gianti M, Delmastro GB (2006) Prime Notizie Sulla Presenza in Territorio Italiano di Pharmacis bertrandi (Le Cerf, 1936) (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae). Rivista Piemontese di Storia Naturale 27: 133–141.
  • Grehan JR (2012) Evidence for the generic placement of the ghost moth Korscheltellus fusconebulosa (De Geer, 1778) (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) and comments on the monophyly of Korscheltellus Börner, 1920. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences 41: 29–32.
  • Jiang N, Li XX, Li QP, Li WJ, Han H-X (2016) Thitarodes Viette, 1968: a new generic synonym and a new species from China (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterologica 44(175): 373–378. http://www.redalyc.org/html/455/45549999002/
  • Kandul NP, Lukhtanov VA, Dantchenko AV, Coleman JWS, Sekercioglu CH, Haig D, Pierce NE (2004) Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner, 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF1-α: karyotype diversification and species radiation. Systematic Biology 53(2): 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490423692
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kristal PM, Hirneisen N, Steiner A (1994) Eine weitere endemische Hepialidae aus den Alpen: Pharmacis claudiae sp. n. (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Nota Lepidopterologica 17: 53–72.
  • Le Cerf F (1936) Une hépiale nouvelle de France (Lep. Hepialidae), Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 41: 290–292.
  • Leraut P (2006) Moths of Europe. Volume 1: saturnids, lasiocampids, hawkmoths, tiger moths. NAP Editions, Verrières-le-Buisson, 392 pp.
  • Longieras A (2013) Nouvelles observations de Pharmacis bertrandi (Le Cerf, 1936) dans le Haut-Queyras (Hautes-Alpes). Alexanor 25(6): 355–360.
  • Milla L, Nieukerken EJ van, Vijverberg R, Doorenweerd C, Wilcox SA, Halsey M, Young DA, Jones T, Kallies A, Hilton DJ (2017) A preliminary molecular phylogeny of shield-bearer moths (Lepidoptera: Adeloidea: Heliozelidae) highlights rich undescribed diversity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 120: 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.12.004
  • Nielsen ES, Robinson GS, Wagner DL (2000) Ghost-moths of the world: a global inventory and bibliography of the Exoporia (Mnesarchaeoidea and Hepialoidea) (Lepidoptera). Journal of Natural History 34: 823–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/002229300299282
  • Pentinsaari M, Salmela H, Mutanen M, Roslin T (2016) Molecular evolution of a widely-adopted taxonomic marker (COI) across the animal tree of life. Scientic Reports 6: 35275. https://doi/org/10.1038/srep35275
  • Simonsen TJ (2018) Splendid ghost moths and their allies. A revision of Australian Abantiades, Oncopera, Aenetus, Archaeoaenetus and Zelotypia. Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera 12: 1–312.
  • Simonsen TJ, Huemer P (2014) Phylogeography of Hepialus humuli (L.) (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) in Europe: short distance vs. large scale postglacial expansions from multiple Alpine refugia and taxonomic implications. Insect Systematics & Evolution 45: 209–249. https://doi/org/10.1163/1876312X-44032104
  • Teobaldelli A (1977) Eine neue Hepialus-Art aus Italien. Nachrichtenblatt der bayerischen Entomologen 26: 38–43.
  • Viette P (1949) Contribution à l’étude des Hepialidae. 12e note Genres et synonymie. Lambillionea 49: 101–104.
  • Wagner DL (1988) Taxonomic status of Korscheltellus Börner in North America (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 96: 53–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25009697
  • Wagner DL, Rosovsky J (1991) Mating systems in primitive Lepidoptera with emphasis on the reproductive behaviour of Korscheltellus gracilis (Hepialidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 102: 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1991.tb00003.x
  • Wilke T, Schultheiß R, Albrecht C (2009) As time goes by: a simple fool’s guide to molecular clock approaches in invertebrates. American Malacological Bulletin 27: 25–45. https://doi.org/10.4003/006.027.0203
  • Zilli A (1988) Un endemismo appenninico misconosciuto: Hepialus aemilianus Constanti, 1911. Bollettino della Società entomologica italiana, Genova 120(1): 43–48.
  • Zou ZW, Liu X, Zhang GR (2010) Revision of taxonomic system of the genus Hepialus (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) currently adopted in China. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition) 25(1): 114–120. [In Chinese, with English abstract]